Table 2.
Estimated coefficients examining the relationship between coach narcissism and athlete performance and perceived self-enhancement opportunity.
| Fixed effects | Athlete performance (end time) | Athlete perceived self-enhancement opportunity | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||||||
| B | SE | R2 | B | SE | R2 | B | SE | R2 | B | SE | R2 | |
| Constant | 455.38 | 2.03 | 454.95 | 1.99 | 4.64 | 0.11 | 4.66 | 0.11 | ||||
| Controls | ||||||||||||
| Athlete gender a | 57.48*** | 2.75 | 56.48*** | 2.72 | − 0.63*** | 0.15 | − 0.58*** | 0.15 | ||||
| Distance | − 4.49*** | 1.11 | − 3.98*** | 1.11 | 0.17* | 0.08 | 0.15† | 0.08 | ||||
| Tenure with coach | − 3.75** | 1.28 | .680 | − 3.74** | 1.25 | − 0.11 | 0.07 | .102 | − 0.11 | 0.07 | ||
| Predictor | ||||||||||||
| Coach narcissism | − 3.52** | 1.20 | .695 | 0.16* | 0.07 | .118 | ||||||
| Random intercept (τ00) | 224.93 | 203.23 | 0.09 | 0.09 | ||||||||
| Model fit | ||||||||||||
| AIC | 2245.00 | 2238.46 | 809.31 | 806.83 | ||||||||
| BIC | 2266.29 | 2263.31 | 830.60 | 831.67 | ||||||||
| − 2LL | 2233.00 | 2224.46 | 797.31 | 792.83 | ||||||||
| χ2(1) | 8.54** | 4.48* | ||||||||||
N = 257.
a1 = man, 2 = woman; Distance in meters; Tenure in years; R2 = Marginal R2; Fit indices presented are based on ML estimation; χ2(1) is the difference between the − 2 log likelihoods of Model 1 vs. Model 2 and Model 3 vs. Model 4, respectively.
†p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.