Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 29;13:21028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47548-0

Table 4.

The association between metabolic risk factors and dietary patterns in the logistic regression analysis.

Quantiles Hypertension (yes/no) Crude model Adjusted model 1 Adjusted model 2
Quantile 1 34/70 Ref p-value Ref p-value Ref p-value
Westernized dietary pattern scores and hypertensiona
Quantile 2 25/78 0.66 (0.36,1.21) 0.18 0.82 (0.40,1.68) 0.58 0.63 (0.32,1.22) 0.17
Quantile 3 13/91 0.29 (0.14, 0.60)  < 0.01 0.35 (0.15, 0.80) 0.01 0.28 (0.13, 0.60)  < 0.01
Quantile 4 14/87 0.33 (0.16, 0.67) < 0.02 0.46 (0.21,1.05) 0.06 0.35 (0.17, 0.75)  < 0.01
Quantile 1 24/79 Ref p-value Ref p-value Ref p-value
Traditional dietary pattern and hypertensiona
Quantile 2 14/90 0.51 (0.25, 1.06) 0.07 0.48 (0.21, 1.13) 0.09 0.43 (0.20, 0.94) 0.04
Quantile 3 22/80 0.91 (0.47, 1.75) 0.76 0.79 (0.37,1.70) 0.54 0.84 (0.42,1.71) 0.63
Quantile 4 25/78 1.06 (0.56, 2.00) 0.87 1.05 (0.49, 2.25) 0.89 0.80 (0.40,1.60) 0.53
Quantile 1 36/68 Ref p-value Ref p-value Ref p-value
Westernized dietary pattern and overweight/obesityb
Quantile 2 26/76 0.65 (.35,1.18) 0.15 0.61 (0.32, 1.16) 0.13 0.61 (0.32, 1.18) 0.14
Quantile 3 29/73 0.75 (.42, 1.35) 0.34 0.78 (0.41, 1.49) 0.45 0.82 (0.42, 1.58) 0.55
Quantile 4 29/72 0.76 (.42, 1.37) 0.36 0.79 (0.41, 1.50) 0.46 0.79 (0.41, 1.52) 0.48
Quantile 1 34/68 Ref p-value Ref p-value Ref p-value
Traditional dietary pattern and overweight/obesityb
Quantile 2 31/73 0.85 (0.47, 1.53) 0.59 0.77 (0.41, 1.46) 0.43 0.77 (0.40, 1.46) 0.43
Quantile 3 22/80 0.55 (0.29, 1.03) 0.06 0.48 (0.24, 0.93) 0.03 0.46 (0.23, 0.91) 0.03
Quantile 4 33/68 0.97 (0.54, 1.74) 0.92 0.69 (0.36, 1.33) 0.27 0.66 (0.34, 1.27) 0.27
Quantile 1 70/32 Ref p-value Ref p-value Ref p-value
Westernized dietary pattern and abdominal obesityb
Quantile 2 74/26 1.30 (0.71, 2.40) 0.40 1.19 (0.61, 2.34) 0.61 1.31 (0.66, 2.61) 0.44
Quantile 3 61/41 0.68 (0.38, 1.21) 0.19 0.55 (0.28, 1.06) 0.07 0.61 (0.31, 1.20) 0.15
Quantile 4 67/34 0.90 (0.50, 1.62) 0.73 0.80 (0.42, 1.54) 0.51 0.91 (0.47, 1.78) 0.79
Quantile 1 68/33 Ref p-value Ref p-value Ref p-value
Traditional dietary pattern and abdominal obesityb
Quantile 2 70/32 1.06 (0.59, 1.91) 0.84 0.89 (0.46, 1.73) 0.73 0.89 (0.45, 1.74) 0.73
Quantile 3 64/37 0.84 (0.47, 1.50) 0.55 0.70 (0.36, 1.36) 0.29 0.65 (0.33, 1.29) 0.22
Quantile 4 70/31 1.10 (0.61, 1.98) 0.76 0.58 (0.29, 1.16) 0.13 0.58 (0.28, 1.18) 0.13

aModel 1 adjusted for: age, marital status, educational status, and khat chewing; Model 2 adjusted for: marital status, educational status, and kchat chewing. bModel 1 adjusted for sex, marital status, educational status, occupational status, and physical activity level; Model 2 adjusted for sex, age, marital status, educational status, occupational status, and physical activity level.