Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 29;19(4):e1361. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1361
Bias Author's judgment Support for judgment
Risk of bias arising from the randomization process Some concerns Randomized allocation but no information on allocation concealment. There was no significant differences at baseline.
Risk of bias due to deviations from the intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention) Some concerns Single bind study with appropriate analysis used to estimate the effect of assignment to intervention.
Risk of bias due to deviations from the intended interventions (effect of adhering to intervention) Low risk Participants might have been aware of the study while personnel were blinded.
Missing outcome data Low risk Over 95% of participants were included in analysis.
Risk of bias in measurement of the outcome Low risk Outcomes were measured appropriately.
Risk of bias in selection of the reported result Low risk All outcomes reported appropriately.