Table 3.
Priority HPV self-sampling delivery strategies for cervical cancer screening.
| Priority HPV self-sampling delivery strategies for cervical cancer screening | Summing by votes 1 = low priority 5 = highly priority | Total number of voting scores (number of votes × ranking score) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 40 | |
| Male partner involvement | 5 | 2 | 1 | 28 | ||
| Privacy | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 31 | |
| Facility based self-sampling | 2 | 3 | 3 | 33 | ||
| Local language for instructions | 1 | 3 | 4 | 35 | ||
| Linkage to care after positive result | 1 | 3 | 4 | 35 | ||
| Community based self-sampling | 1 | 2 | 5 | 36 | ||
| Choice of sampling device | 1 | 2 | 5 | 36 | ||
| Early results notification | 1 | 7 | 37 | |||
| Adequate education and awareness on cervical cancer | 1 | 7 | 39 | |||
The bold values represent the top rankled barriers and delivery strategies respectively.