Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 30;7(6):e10922. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10922

TABLE 2.

Comparative frequency of selected clinical and procedural experiences encountered by EM residents at rural versus academic training locations.

Rural ED patients Academic ED patients p‐value
Experiences/100 h a N shifts for one exposure b Experiences/100 h a N shifts for one exposure b
Clinical/procedural experience
Ambulance form 9.32 0.9 0.07 118.8 <0.0001
Critical care 4.97 1.7 11.4 0.73 <0.0001
Laceration repair 3.39 2.5 2.0 4.2 0.0004
Splint/cast application 1.53 5.5 0.07 118.8 <0.0001
Trauma evaluation 1.19 7.02 6.72 1.24 <0.0001
Stroke diagnosis 0.68 12.3 1.66 5.01 0.005
Incision & drainage 0.68 12.3 0.2 41.1 0.0002
Fracture reduction 0.4 21 0.17 50.4 0.05
Procedural sedation 0.4 21 0.55 15.1 0.44
Intubation 0.23 37 0.52 15.9 0.13
STEMI diagnosis 0.17 49 0.33 25.6 0.3
Arthrocentesis 0.17 49 0.17 48.9 0.99
Cardiac arrest diagnosis 0.11 73 0.38 22.2 0.11
Complex laceration repair 0.11 73 0.15 57.4 0.73
Lumbar puncture 0.06 147.5 0.26 32.3 0.20
Vaginal delivery 0 0.0002 4436
Chest tube 0 0.11 75.6 0.21
Lateral canthotomy 0 0
a

The frequency of a given clinical or procedural experience being encountered per 100 clinical hours worked by a resident.

b

The number of shifts expected to be needed to predict one exposure to a given experience. Assumes a shift length of 12 h.