Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Soc Psychol. 2023 Aug 8;109:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104520

Table 4.

Means, standard deviations, reliabilities; and correlations

Variable M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. Expected pain felt by women 2.66 0.44 (.83)
2. Expected pain claimed by women 2.68 0.52 .80*** (.89)
3. Expected pain exaggeration by women 0.02 0.31 −.09 .52*** (X)
4. Expected pain felt by men 2.37 0.41 .59*** .46*** −.08 (.77)
5. Expected pain claimed by men 2.19 0.49 .24* .27** .11 .55*** (.86)
6. Expected pain exaggeration by men −0.18 0.43 −.29** −.13 .20* −.33*** .61*** (X)
7. Attributions of emotional dramatization traits to women 3.76 1.01 .22* .29** .18 .15 .10 −.03 (.95)
8. Attributions of emotional dramatization traits to men 3.21 1.01 −.22* −.13 .09 .16 .36*** .25* .51*** (.95)
9. Stereotypes of women as emotionally dramatizing 4.36 1.31 .25* .29** .13 .12 .04 −.06 .50*** .21* (.90)
10. Stereotypes of men as emotionally dramatizing 3.30 1.18 −.00 .01 .02 .18 .31** .18 .28** .52*** .40*** (.85)
11. Gendered stereotype endorsement 1.06 1.36 .24* .28** .11 −.05 −.23* −.21* .24* −24* .61*** −.47*** (X)
12. Internal motivation to respond without sexism 7.00 2.02 .02 −.03 −.09 .12 .18 .09 −.21* .03 −.28** .11 −.36*** (.91)
13. External motivation to respond without sexism 4.12 2.29 .25* .27** .08 .14 .05 −.08 .28** .12 .42*** .16 .26** −.10 0

Note. M and SD are used to represent mean and standard deviation, respectively. Reliabilities (α) me displayed un the diagonal.

*

indicates p < .05.

**

indicates p < .01,

***

indicates p< .001.