Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 4;16(12):2683–2692. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad221

Table 2:

Cox regression model results on thromboembolic (Model 1) and hemorrhagic events (Model 2).

Model 1: Model 2:
N of patients = 368 N of patients = 368
N of thromboembolic events = 30 N of hemorrhagic events = 65
HR (95%CI) P-value HR (95%CI) P-value
LAA occlusion vs warfarin 0.19 (0.04–0.96) 0.045 0.37 (0.16–0.83) 0.017
LAA occlusion vs No-OAT 0.16 (0.04–0.66) 0.011 0.51 (0.23–1.12) 0.094
Gender (males) 0.98 (0.43–2.24) 0.954 1.2 (0.68–2.15) 0.529
Age (yrs) 1.01 (0.96–1.07) 0.634 1.02 (0.98–1.05) 0.283
Dialytic age (yrs) 0.95 (0.88–1.04) 0.261 1.03 (0.99–1.06) 0.111
CHA2DS2VASc (for each point) 1.22 (0.88–1.7) 0.236 0.97 (0.74–1.27) 0.822
HASBLED (for each point) 1.26 (0.71–2.25) 0.436 1.17 (0.76–1.8) 0.466
Persistent vs paroxysmal AF 0.62 (0.25–1.55) 0.309 1.24 (0.6–2.56) 0.567
Permanent vs paroxysmal AF 0.56 (0.2–1.58) 0.270 1.33 (0.64–2.77) 0.442
Dyslipidemia 1.15 (0.52–2.54) 0.723 0.72 (0.4–1.28) 0.260
Peripheral artery disease 0.61 (0.24–1.55) 0.299 0.95 (0.52–1.72) 0.863
Previous major bleedings 0.94 (0.33–2.65) 0.901 1.77 (0.93–3.37) 0.085
Antiplatelet therapy 1.11 (0.46–2.65) 0.813 0.74 (0.4–1.36) 0.334

AF, atrial fibrillation; LAA, left atrial appendage; OAT, oral anticoagulant therapy.