Table 1.
Endoscopic resection (ER) N = 339 |
ER + subsequent bowel resection N = 219 |
|
---|---|---|
Age, years, median (IQR) | 73 ± 16 | 65 ± 15.5 |
Sex, n (%) | ||
Male | 200 (59.0) | 116 (53.0) |
Female | 139 (41.0) | 103 (47.0) |
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 25 ± 5.3 | 26 ± 5.2 |
Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) | ||
0 | 224 (66.1) | 165 (75.3) |
1–2 | 93 (27.4) | 39 (17.8) |
≥3 | 22 (6.5) | 15 (6.8) |
Location, n (%) | ||
Colon | 228 (67.2) | 167 (76.3) |
Rectum | 111 (32.7) | 52 (23.7) |
Polyp shape, n (%) | ||
Pedunculated | 238 (70.2) | 127 (58.0) |
Sessile | 67 (19.8) | 74 (33.8) |
Missing | 34 (10.0) | 18 (8.2) |
Polyp size, mm, median (IQR) | 17 ± 13.0 | 18 ± 11.0 |
Polypectomy technique, n (%) | ||
En bloc resection | 273 (80.5) | 159 (72.6) |
Piecemeal resection | 66 (19.5) | 60 (27.4) |
Tumour grade, n (%) | ||
Low grade | 304 (89.7) | 181 (82.6) |
High grade | 25 (7.4) | 23 (10.5) |
Cannot be evaluated | 10 (2.9) | 15 (6.8) |
Type of carcinoma, n (%) | ||
Adenocarcinoma | 330 (97.3) | 201 (91.8) |
Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 9 (2.7) | 18 (8.2) |
Resection margin, n (%) | ||
Negative (> 1 mm) | 156 (46.0) | 55 (25.1) |
Positive (≤ 1 mm) | 130 (38.3) | 121 (55.3) |
Cannot be evaluated | 53 (15.6) | 44 (20.1) |
Resection margin, n (%) | ||
0 mm | 44 (13.0) | 61 (27.9) |
>0 mm | 242 (71.4) | 114 (52.1) |
Cannot be evaluated | 53 (15.6) | 44 (20.1) |
Mucinous component, n (%) | ||
Absent | 317 (93.5) | 201 (91.8) |
Present | 19 (5.6) | 12 (5.5) |
Missing | <5 | 6 (2.7) |
Haggitt classification, n (%) | ||
Level 1–2 | 74 (21.8) | 23 (10.5) |
Level 3–4 | 127 (37.5) | 66 (30.1) |
Cannot be evaluated | 73 (21.5) | 58 (26.5) |
Kikuchi classification, n (%) | ||
Sm1–Sm2 | 25 (7.4) | 9 (4.1) |
Sm3 | 26 (7.7) | 44 (20.1) |
Cannot be evaluated | 14 (4.1) | 16 (7.3) |
High risk (Haggitt level 3–4 or Kikuchi Sm3) | ||
No | 100 (29.5) | 33 (15.1) |
Yes | 154 (45.4) | 110 (50.2) |
Cannot be evaluated | 85 (25.1) | 76 (34.7) |
Intramural venous invasion, n (%) | ||
Absent | 266 (78.5) | 149 (68.0) |
Present | 56 (16.5) | 43 (19.6) |
Cannot be evaluated | 17 (5.0) | 27 (12.4) |
Lymphatic invasion, n (%) | ||
Absent | 240 (70.8) | 123 (56.2) |
Present | 84 (24.8) | 75 (34.2) |
Cannot be evaluated | 15 (4.4) | 21 (9.6) |
Perineural invasion, n (%) | ||
Absent | 318 (93.8) | 194 (88.6) |
Present | <6 | <6 |
Cannot be evaluated | 16 (4.7) | 24 (11.0) |
Tumour budding, n (%) | ||
Yes | 232 (68.4) | 138 (63.0) |
No | 40 (11.8) | 13 (6.0) |
Cannot be evaluated | 67 (19.8) | 68 (31.0) |
Budding level, n (%) | ||
Bd1 | 179 (52.8) | 89 (40.6) |
Bd2–3 | 53 (15.6) | 41 (18.7) |
Cannot be evaluated | 108 (31.9) | 89 (40.6) |
pMLH1, n (%) | ||
No expression | <6 | <6 |
Normal expression | 326 (96.2) | 207 (94.5) |
Heterogeneous expression | 8 (2.3) | <6 |
Cannot be evaluated | <6 | <6 |
pMSH2, n (%) | ||
No expression | <6 | <6 |
Normal expression | 326 (96.2) | 209 (95.4) |
Heterogeneous expression | 8 (2.3) | <6 |
Cannot be evaluated | <6 | <6 |
pMSH6, n (%) | ||
No expression | <6 | <6 |
Normal expression | 327 (96.5) | 209 (95.4) |
Heterogeneous expression | 8 (2.3) | <6 |
Cannot be evaluated | <6 | <6 |
pPMS2, n (%) | ||
No expression | <6 | <6 |
Normal expression | 326 (96.2) | 207 (94.5) |
Heterogeneous expression | 8 (2.3) | <6 |
Cannot be evaluate | <6 | <6 |
Endoscopic complication, n (%) | ||
Yes | 11 (3.2) | <6 |
Bleeding | 10 | <6 |
Reoperation | <6 | <6 |
No | 328 (96.8) | 213 (97.3) |
Surgical approach, n (%) | ||
Open | – | 95 (43.4) |
Laparoscopic | – | 124 (56.6) |
Conversion to open surgery | 18 (14.5) | |
Surgical complication, n (%) | ||
Intraoperative complications | – | 8 (3.7) |
Postoperative surgical complications | – | |
Yes | – | 41 (18.7) |
No | – | 178 (81.3) |
Postoperative medical complications | – | |
Yes | – | 16 (7.3) |
No | – | 203 (92.7) |
Postoperative complications according to CD classification, n (%) | ||
CD grade I | <6 | |
CD grade II | 10 (17.59) | |
CD grade IIIa | <6 | |
CD grade IIIb | 19 (33.3) | |
CD grade IV | 8 (14.0) | |
CD grade V | 9 (15.8) |
BMI body mass index, ASA American Society of Anaesthesiology, CD Clavien–Dindo classification