Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 8;14(5):82–87. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75409

Table 2.

Percentage of students reporting adopting the behaviours related to structured reflection

Behaviours Never Rarely Sometimes Often Always Often/Always
a) I generate by myself several plausible diagnostic hypotheses 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (10%) 21 (43%) 23 (47%) 44 (90%)
b) I argue for myself my diagnostic hypotheses * 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (6%) 24 (50%) 21 (44%) 45 (94%)
c) For a generated diagnostic hypothesis, I identify in the patient the clinical elements that support this diagnosis 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 25 (51%) 23 (47%) 48 (98%)
d) For a generated diagnostic hypothesis, I identify the clinical elements that do not support this diagnosis 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 6 (12%) 27 (55%) 15 (31%) 42 (86%)
e) For a generated diagnostic hypothesis, I strive to identify additional elements that could be sought to support this diagnosis 0 (0%) 7 (14%) 10 (20%) 25 (51%) 7 (14%) 32 (65%)
f) I repeat the same exercise for the plausible alternative diagnostic hypotheses that I consider 0 (0%) 3 (6%) 13 (27%) 28 (57%) 5 (10%) 33 (67%)
g) I compare / contrast in writing the different diagnostic hypotheses by listing the pros and cons of each 3 (6%) 7 (14%) 14 (29%) 19 (39%) 6 (12%) 25 (51%)
h) I assign an order of probability to the hypotheses I keep in my differential diagnosis 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 7 (14%) 21 (43%) 20 (41%) 41 (84%)
i) For a given diagnostic hypothesis, I reactivate my knowledge of its usual (typical) clinical presentation (predisposing factors, symptoms and clinical signs) 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 11 (22%) 26 (53%) 11 (22%) 37 (75%)
j) For a given diagnostic hypothesis, I try to revise or enrich my knowledge of its clinical presentation (predisposing factors, symptoms and clinical signs) * 0 (0%) 2 (4%) 13 (27%) 24 (50%) 9 (19%) 33 (69%)
*

There are some missing data for SR. Percentage have been calculated on 48 responses for b and j, and 49 responses for the remaining items (a, c, d, e, f, g,h, i).