Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;146(12):5044–5059. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad266

Table 3.

Longitudinal analysis of rating tools dataa

Rating tool XPA XPC XPD XPE XPG XPV Global χ2 test Statistically significant pairwise contrasts
SARA total 0.63 (0.38, 0.89) −0.03 (−0.26, 0.19) 0.91 (0.61, 1.21) 0.05 (−0.52, 0.62) 0.54 (−0.07, 1.15) 0.07 (−0.29, 0.43) 32.37, df = 5, P < 0.001 D versus C, V
A versus C
ADL total 0.42 (0.16, 0.67) −0.01 (−0.22, 0.21) 0.55 (0.19, 0.92) 0.07 (−0.51, 0.65) 0.36 (−0.32, 1.04) 0.16 (−0.28, 0.60) 10.39, df = 5, P = 0.065 Non-significant
(D versus C, P = 0.097; A versus C, P = 0.131)
INAS total 0.19 (0.04, 0.34) −0.02 (−0.14, 0.11) 0.36 (0.19, 0.52) 0.14 (−0.21, 0.49) −0.18 (−0.51, 0.14) 0.03 (−0.20, 0.26) 17.66, df = 5, P = 0.003 D versus C, G

ADL = Activities of Daily Living questionnaire; INAS = Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs; SARA = Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.

aResults represent estimated mean progression rates (points per year), as a function of follow-up time, for each total score in each complementation group (accounting for intrasubject variability), with their 95% CIs. χ2 values represent the test for global differences among progression rates in the groups. If such test is significant (P < 0.05), pairwise contrasts are calculated and corrected for multiple comparisons via the Tukey’s method. Statistically significant contrasts for each total score (P < 0.05) are summarized in the last column.