Table 4.

Type II hair cell K_V currents: Activation voltage dependence. Mean ± SEM. g is effect size, Hedge’s g. KWA is Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA.

Zone	K v 1.8	Peak V 1/2 , mV a	Peak S, mVb, c	A-type gmax/Cm, nS/pFd	SS Vhalf, mVe	SS S, mVf	SS gmax/Cm, nS/pFg, h	N cells	Age (median, range)
LES	+/+	−19.8 ± 0.6	11.8 ± 0.4	4.0 ± 0.3	−25.0 ± 0.5	8.7 ± 0.3	7.1 ± 0.8	37	46, 14–312
	+/−	−19.8 ± 0.8	12.8 ± 0.4	3.8 ± 0.3	−26.8 ± 0.8	8.7 ± 0.3	4.9 ± 0.4	35	29, 13–280
	−/−	−18 ± 1	11.7 ± 0.4	0.37 ± 0.05	−19 ± 1	12.1 ± 0.5	1.8 ± 0.2	20	128, 15–355
MES	+/+	−22 ± 1	11 ± 0.7	4.1 ± 0.7	−26 ± 1	8.3 ± 0.5	9 ± 1	11	94, 22–296
	+/−	−21 ± 1	11.8 ± 0.4	3.6 ± 0.5	−27 ± 1	9.0 ± 0.3	5.9 ± 0.7	16	24, 13–52
	−/−	−19 ± 1	10.8 ± 0.6	0.6 ± 0.1	−20 ± 1	10.7 ± 0.7	2.5 ± 0.3	15	84, 28–355
Striola	+/+	−24 ± 1	9.6 ± 0.5	5 ± 1	−26.6 ± 0.9	8.2 ± 0.4	12 ± 1	7	45, 40–287
	+/−	−25 ± 2	9.4 ± 0.4	2.6 ± 0.6	−28 ± 2	8.2 ± 0.3	10 ± 2	6	19, 14–30
	−/−	−21.3 ± 0.9	10.3 ± 0.5	0.7 ± 0.1	−21.7 ± 0.8	10.5 ± 0.6	3.9 ± 0.5	8	202, 29–298

^aStriola vs LES: 2-way ANOVA, p = 0.00116, g 0.9

^bStriola vs MES: 2-way ANOVA, p = 0.016, g 0.8; Striola vs LES: 2-way ANOVA, p = 7.5E-6, g 1.2

^c−/− vs +/−: 2-way ANOVA, p = 0.036, g 0.5

^d−/− vs +/+: Welch ANOVA, p < 1E-9, g 2.3; −/− vs +/−: Welch ANOVA, p < 1E-9, g 2.3

^e−/− vs +/+: 2-way ANOVA, p < 1E-9, g 1.4; −/− vs +/−: 2-way ANOVA, p < 1E-9, g 1.6

^f−/− vs +/+: 2-way ANOVA, p < 1E-9, g 1.4; −/− vs +/−: 2-way ANOVA, p = 4.5E-7, g 1.1

^g−/− vs +/+: Welch ANOVA, p < 1E-9, g 1.6; −/− vs +/−: Welch ANOVA, p < 1E-9, g 1.3; +/+ vs +/−: Welch ANOVA, p = 0.007, g 1.6

^hStriola vs LES: 1-way ANOVA, p = 0.001, g 0.9); Striola vs MES: 1-way ANOVA, p = 0.01, g 0.8