Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2025 Mar 6:2023.09.27.559801. [Version 3] doi: 10.1101/2023.09.27.559801

Figure 4: Comparisons of skDER and CiDDER to other dereplication approaches.

Figure 4:

Barplots show the A) runtime (based on using 30 threads), B) maximum memory consumption, and C) total representative genomes selected from dereplication of 5,291 Enterococcus genomes by different methods. Time and memory needed to run CheckM2 is not accounted for in the plots for two galah dereplication investigations where CheckM2 information was incorporated. D) The proportion of non-representative genomes that meet ANI and AF criteria in relation to a nearby reference genome. Neither indicates either that ANI < 99% or AF < 25%.