Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2025 Jan 15:2023.11.20.567959. Originally published 2023 Nov 20. [Version 2] doi: 10.1101/2023.11.20.567959

Table 1.

Genome assembly statistics for all genomes used in this study.

Species Strain Subtype Source Citation Scaffolds (#) Size (Mb) N50 (Kb) GC content (% GC) BUSCO content2 Protein-coding genes
Blastocystis sp. JDR 1 Human This study 114 17.5 550 54.5% 61.2% 7891
Blastocystis sp. NandII 1 Human This study 54 16.0 939 54.7% 61.2% 7157
Blastocystis sp. NMH 3 Human This study 36 14.6 582 51.3% 58.0% 6571
Blastocystis sp. DL 3 Human This study 56 14.0 506 51.6% 55.7% 6154
Blastocystis sp. BT1 4 Human This study 34 15.3 882 39.4% 57.6% 7421
Blastocystis sp. Rus-B N/A Russian tortoise This study 33 33.3 1323 23.1% 43.2% 8547
Blastocystis sp. Rus-S N/A Russian tortoise This study 258 26.1 505 21.8% 42.0% 8501
Blastocystis sp. Hermanns N/A Hermann’s tortoise This study 229 27.1 289 21.5% 42.4% 8349
Blastocystis sp. WR1 4 Laboratory Wistar rat No publication 1,301 12.9 30 39.5% 56.5% 5707
Blastocystis sp. NandII 1 Human Gentekaki et al. 2017 580 16.5 79 55.0% 61.1% 6544
Blastocystis sp. Singapore 7 Human Denoeud et al. 2011 54 18.8 901 45.0% 52.2% 6020
Proteromonas lacertae LA N/A Sand lizard Zahonova et al. 20232 1,447 52.2 93 27.0% 62.7% 23189
Cafeteria burkhardae BVI N/A Environmental Hackl et al. 2020 169 36.3 465 70.0% 54.9% 8591
1.

BUSCO version 5.6.1 with eukaryote_odb10 lineage, metaeuk genome mode

2.

Gapped scaffold N50.

3.

Citation for genome only. Annotations not publicly available and generated for comparative genomics in this work.