Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 16;14:1274478. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1274478

Table 3.

Writing strategies questionnaire Item analysis at test–retest time-points.

Test Retest
Item M SD Sk K αF M SD Sk K αF
Planning factor 0.71 0.76
1. 3.14 0.89 0.10 −0.15 0.70 3.63 0.72 0.34 −0.50 0.74
2. 2.64 1.25 0.32 −0.95 0.67 2.55 1.14 0.33 −0.67 0.73
3. 3.38 1.22 −0.23 −0.97 0.61 3.43 1.08 −0.50 −0.23 0.68
4. 3.00 1.23 −0.11 −0.99 0.67 3.24 1.24 −0.22 −1.10 0.70
R5. 3.91 1.05 −0.39 −1.19 0.70 4.05 1.08 −0.68 −0.75 0.73
11. 3.89 1.02 −0.70 −0.04 0.68 3.99 0.83 −0.43 −0.47 0.76
Revising factor 0.78 0.76
18. 2.83 1.00 0.22 −0.39 0.71 3.07 0.92 0.36 −0.44 0.68
21. 2.60 0.93 0.41 0.06 0.71 2.69 1.05 0.36 −0.21 0.68
22. 2.64 1.08 0.29 −0.70 0.74 2.54 1.05 0.45 −0.38 0.79
23. 3.69 0.93 −0.50 −0.16 0.82 3.83 1.01 −0.67 −0.05 0.70
26. 3.15 1.03 0.30 −0.40 0.73 3.38 1.03 −0.10 −0.72 0.69

Sk, skewness; K, kurtosis. RItems recoded in the analyses. αF, change in Cronbach’s alpha of the factor the item belongs to if the item is removed.