Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 3;21:5620–5629. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.056

Table 2.

Pairwise comparison of the top-ranked predicted targets across different methodologies including: AF2, OP1, OP2 and OP3.

Target AF2
AFM-OP1
AFM-OP2
AFM-OP3
Target AF2
AFM-OP1
AFM-OP2
AFM-OP3
Target AF2
AFM-OP1
AFM-OP2
AFM-OP3
GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS GDT_TS
7BRM-D1 83.82 86.24* 81.49 84.69 7RB9-D1 85.59 85.46 85.39 85.12 T1042-D1 61.32 59.78 59.78 60.60
7BXT-D1 93.99 90.38 94.71 90.63 T1024-D0 85.68 87.02 65.73 87.02 T1043-D1 25.51 25.84 25.34 27.70
7C2K-D1 93.70 93.29 91.14 93.48 T1024-D1 90.29 89.90 90.16 89.90 T1045s1-D1 95.62 96.10 96.27 96.59
7EDA-D1 98.36 92.01 90.00 95.07 T1024-D2 91.18 91.30 91.30 91.79 T1045s2-D1 93.83 92.02 92.62 93.37
7EV9-D1 97.00 89.69 90.60 89.69 T1025-D1 98.35 98.15 98.25 98.35 T1046s1-D1 97.57 96.87 97.22 97.92
7KU7-D1 79.63 80.46 83.89* 80.56 T1026-D1 92.64 92.81 92.98 92.47 T1046s2-D1 98.76 98.58 98.40 98.76
7KZZ-D1 71.90 75.89 78.63* 75.89 T1028-D1 92.98 93.15 92.38 93.15 T1047s1-D1 47.87 46.68 46.45 47.99
7L1K-D1 97.83 97.83 97.67 97.83 T1029-D1 46.20 46.20 45.40 46.20 T1047s2-D1 89.12 88.61 87.08 87.58
7L6U-D1 91.35 90.22 86.38 90.22 T1030-D0 53.48 68.13* 67.12 62.64 T1047s2-D3 50.43 50.22 49.78 50.22
7LC6-D1 97.49 97.31 97.27 97.18 T1030-D1 71.10 68.34 69.64 70.94 T1049-D1 93.28 92.91 92.72 92.91
7LCI-D1 67.83 67.70 61.87 69.54* T1030-D2 89.50 85.92 82.14 85.29 T1053-D0 88.72 87.76 88.24 88.28
7LS5-D1 96.52 96.31 95.80 96.21 T1031-D1 94.47 94.47 90.00 94.74 T1053-D1 89.01 89.01 89.26 89.26
7LSX-D1 94.72 93.80 93.90 94.92 T1032-D1 65.59 65.29 65.00 64.85 T1053-D2 84.65 82.46 82.31 85.96
7LV9-D1 73.47 69.64 57.40 69.64 T1033-D1 52.75 42.00 50.00 46.00 T1054-D1 89.34 88.99 88.46 88.99
7LVR-D1 94.29 94.12 94.00 94.29 T1034-D1 95.51 95.19 95.35 95.35 T1055-D1 87.91 88.73 87.91 88.73
7LX5-D1 93.91 93.66 92.64 94.04 T1035-D1 87.75 88.24 87.01 88.24 T1056-D1 97.48 95.71 95.41 96.01
7M7B-D1 90.12 90.36 89.41 90.36 T1036s1-D1 83.17 74.80 63.20 74.80 T1065s1-D1 92.86 93.07 93.91 93.07
7M9C-D1 88.28 86.92 87.69 87.98 T1037-D1 84.71 84.03 86.32* 86.08 T1065s2-D1 97.96 98.47 98.21 98.47
7MBY-D1 90.96 92.06 91.18 91.91 T1038-D0 86.84 85.13 41.84 87.24 T1074-D1 93.18 93.37 91.67 92.42
7ME0-D1 99.28 99.28 96.55 99.28 T1038-D1 85.53 81.36 82.89 86.40 T1076-D1 98.98 99.12 99.07 99.12
7MJS-D1 88.53 88.16 88.35 88.53 T1038-D2 91.78 90.79 90.46 91.12 T1078-D1 94.96 94.96 94.57 94.38
7MLZ-D1 82.49 83.12 82.36 83.12 T1039-D1 85.25 83.70 80.59 82.92 T1082-D1 91.67 90.33 90.33 90.33
7MSW-D1 45.01 44.58 41.94 46.15 T1040-D1 56.54 55.96 55.58 57.12 T1090-D1 89.53 89.53 88.87 89.79
7N8I-D1 98.83 98.83 98.83 99.07 T1041-D1 84.71 85.54 85.12 85.12 T1099-D1 79.35 80.76 82.16 80.62

Results in bold represent pair-to-pair models obtained with either AlphaMod procedure with a GDT_TS score higher than the one obtained by AF2 alone. Results with * represent, for each target, a notable quality increase in terms of GDT_TS score. Results in italic represent pair-to-pair models obtained with either AlphaMod procedure with a GDT_TS score equal to those obtained by AF2 alone.