Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 16;7:e51541. doi: 10.2196/51541

Table 6.

Experiences and barriers for family medicine graduate medical residents using teach-back during remote visits.

Preintervention Postintervention
Experiences

I think it’s really helpful, better for patients. Does take a while which is hard with limited slots Generally positive when you have an engaged patient

It’s effective to ensure understanding. It can take a lot of time with those with low education or those with low engagement. Generally positive when there is time

I feel it is positive as it allows me to get a baseline of what the patient understands It almost always highlights areas of misunderstanding

Prolongs visit Positive (because it) ensure(s) patient understands
Barriers

Only barrier is if patient has a baseline mental status of confusion or dementia so cannot use it directly. This is where involving family members in the plan of care is important If the patient is hard of hearing or has a cognitive-deficiency due to dementia etc.

Time limit, do not have enough time during an encounter Time mostly

Communication or use of translator, poor health literacy Patient literacy, internet connectivity issues

Language, educational level Engagement of patient, understanding that teach back is not insulting, time, and interest in putting plan of care into place