Table 6.
Experiences and barriers for family medicine graduate medical residents using teach-back during remote visits.
| Preintervention | Postintervention | ||
| Experiences | |||
|
|
I think it’s really helpful, better for patients. Does take a while which is hard with limited slots | Generally positive when you have an engaged patient | |
|
|
It’s effective to ensure understanding. It can take a lot of time with those with low education or those with low engagement. | Generally positive when there is time | |
|
|
I feel it is positive as it allows me to get a baseline of what the patient understands | It almost always highlights areas of misunderstanding | |
|
|
Prolongs visit | Positive (because it) ensure(s) patient understands | |
| Barriers | |||
|
|
Only barrier is if patient has a baseline mental status of confusion or dementia so cannot use it directly. This is where involving family members in the plan of care is important | If the patient is hard of hearing or has a cognitive-deficiency due to dementia etc. | |
|
|
Time limit, do not have enough time during an encounter | Time mostly | |
|
|
Communication or use of translator, poor health literacy | Patient literacy, internet connectivity issues | |
|
|
Language, educational level | Engagement of patient, understanding that teach back is not insulting, time, and interest in putting plan of care into place | |