TABLE 1.
Current IR detection tool.
| Tool name | Abbreviation | Detection method | Advantages | Limitation | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intron Retention call | IRcall | Uses ranking strategy to calculate IR score | - Reduce false positive results | - It depends on the quality of the used alignment tool to collect data | Bai et al. (2015) |
| Intron Retention classifier | IRclassifier | Uses machine learning technology to build up random forest to detect IR events | - High precision | ||
| - Identification of both known and novel IR events | |||||
| Intron Retention Finder | IRFinder | It detects IR events using IR ratio via measuring the intronic abundance and splicing level | fast and sensitive detection | Possible overlapping between introns and exons from other transcripts | Middleton et al. (2017) |
| High Accuracy and precision | Calculating IR based on junction reads not on the expression level of intron | ||||
| Free available database for over 2000 IR human samples | Multiple position reads from the genome produces noise in the results | ||||
| Efficient detecting of low coverage. IR events | |||||
| Intron REtention Analysis and Detector | iREAD | Employs the entropy score to determine the distribution of intronic reads across the intron region | Limited exon-intron overlapping during read | It has no differential analysis | Li et al. (2020) |
| Analyze both splice junction reads and intron expression level | |||||
| Flexible running operating system | |||||
| Sensitive | |||||
| Keep Me Around | KMA | R packaging tool to quantify IR in RNA data | Reduced false positive results by combining replicates | The IR analysis and quantification are performed in different software | Pimentel et al. (2015) |
| The common feature of retained intron which is flat distribution is not identified |