Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 17;5:1205503. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1205503

Table 1.

Difference in differences comparison of implementation, effectiveness, and service outcomes.

Comparison sites Intervention sites Difference in difference [(Change in intervention sites)—(Change in comparison sites)]
Adjusted for first ANC
Pre (N = 480) Post (N = 478) Pre (N = 480) Post (N = 481) Point estimate Confidence interval p-value
Outcome Definition n (%) or median IQR N n (%) or median IQR N n (%) or median IQR N n (%) or median IQR N
PrEP fidelityb Proportion of women who receive all PrEP-specific steps in a HIV-testing visit, HIV-risk screening, PrEP-counseling/total women receiving antenatal or postnatal services [Risk screening question: “Please answer yes if you were asked about any of the following behaviors today: (Kenyan risk assessment tool HIV risk factors)”] 4 (2.5%) 161 5 (3.0%) 164 14 (8.3%) 168 28 (15.5%) 181 7.6% (−0.2%, 15.4%) 0.057
HIV testingd Proportion of women HIV tested among eligible candidates (not tested in past 6 months, not known HIV positive) 98 (60.1%) 163 107 (65.2%) 164 142 (84.0%) 169 144 (79.6%) 181 −1.5% (−12.9%, 9.9%) 0.800
PrEP risk screeningd Proportion asked questions on HIV risk behavior characteristics (yes vs. no/don’t know) 43 (9.0%) 480 104 (21.8%) 478 146 (30.5%) 479 159 (33.1%) 481 −8.8% (−15.9%, −1.8%) 0.013
PrEP penetrationb Proportion of women who are counseled about PrEP / total women receiving antenatal or postnatal services (“Did anyone talk to you about PrEP today?”) 17 (3.5%) 480 8 (1.7%) 478 30 (6.3%) 480 46 (9.6%) 481 5.4% (1.4%, 9.3%) 0.008
PrEP offerd Proportion offered to start or continue taking PrEP/total women receiving antenatal or postnatal services 8 (1.7%) 480 9 (1.9%) 478 6 (1.3%) 480 28 (5.8%) 481 4.4% (1.5%, 7.2%) 0.002
Proportion offered to start or continue taking PrEP (among those who were HIV negative and at high risk who were screened) 3 (15.8%) 19 6 (9.8%) 61 4 (5.1%) 78 13 (14.0%) 93 −5.9% (−13.8%, 2.1%) 0.148
PrEP uptakec Proportion initiated PrEP today (among those offered) 1 (12.0%) 8 1 (11.0%) 9 0 (0%) 6 0 (0%) 28
Proportion initiated PrEP today (among the full population) 1 (0.2%) 480 1 (0.2%) 478 0 (0%) 480 0 (0%) 481
PrEP continuationc Already taking PrEP and will continue to take PrEP (among those offered) 1 (12.5%) 8 2 (22.2%) 9 1 (16.7%) 6 1 (3.6%) 28
Already taking PrEP and will continue to take PrEP (among the full population) 5 (1.0%) 480 10 (2.1%) 478 9 (1.9%) 480 6 (1.2%) 481
Service timeb Number of minutes receiving services from health care workers 16 (10–33) 192 14 (9–27.5) 192 18 (12–36) 192 17 (11–29) 192 −0.09a (−0.33, 0.14)a 0.435a
Waiting timeb Number of minutes spent waiting to receive services 37 (14.5–74) 192 29 (14–46.5) 192 49 (22.5–77) 192 55 (31–80) 192 0.33a (0.10, 0.56)a 0.005a
Client satisfactionb Satisfaction on a scale of 0–24 points; 6 questions for clients to assess their satisfaction with services received at the facility; Likert scale (worst to best: 1–5) 23.0 (20.0–23.0) 480 23.0 (20.0–24.0) 478 21.0 (19.0 −23.0) 480 23.0 (21.0–23.0) 481 0.66 (0.22, 1.09) 0.003
HCW satisfactionb Average on 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) scale; Likert scale (disagree to agree: 1–5)       19.5 (16.0, 20.0)  
Average on 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measures (AIM) scale; Likert scale (disagree to agree: 1–5)       20.0 (16.0, 20.0)  
Client PrEP knowledgec All correct answers (6 questions based on content covered in counseling sessions) 0 (0%) 480 5 (1%)  478 5 (1%) 480 56 (11.6%) 481 9.6% (6.5, 12.8%) <0.001
Number of correct answers (0–6) 0.975 480 1.234 478 1.042 480 3.019 481 1.72 (1.45, 1.99) <0.001
a

Not adjusted for visit type due to visit type not collected during time-and-motion activity.

b

Primary outcome.

c

Secondary outcome.

d

Post hoc outcome.