Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 17;14:1280346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280346

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics and comparisons of participant characteristics across household types.

Adoptive Household n = 386 (83%) Biological Household n = 80 (17%) Adopted vs. Biological Child
Variables Range M or % SD M or % SD d OR
Child Sex
Male 0–1 57.77 % 42.50 % 1.85*
Female 0–1 42.23 % 57.50 % 0.54*
Child Race & Ethnicity
White non-Hispanic 0–1 55.44 % 62.50 % 0.75
Multiple races 0–1 24.87 % 13.75 % 2.08*
Black 0–1 12.44 % 16.25 % 0.73
Other race or ethnicity 0–1 7.25 % 7.50 % 0.96
Prenatal substance use 0–1
No 0–1 60.62 % 70.20 % 0.64
Yes 0–1 39.38 % 29.80 % 1.53
BF externalizing behaviors −3.7–4.8 0.03 1.80 0.38 1.73 0.01
BF internalizing behaviors −3.5–5.4 0.02 1.56 0.04 1.65 0.20
Prosocial baseline 10.0–72.5 49.82 8.63 45.41 12.22 −0.47**
Prosocial age 11 1.0–10.0 8.31 1.59 7.35 2.05 −0.57**
Positive affectivity 3.4–7.0 5.86 0.53 5.79 0.74 −0.12
Parental warmth 27.5–42.0 37.86 3.27 38.72 3.46 0.26
Neighborhood safety 2.0–4.80 4.56 0.31 3.90 0.62 −1.73**
Neighborhood involvement 1.0–3.0 1.94 0.50 1.48 0.49 −0.92**
Importance of religion 1.0–4.0 1.98 0.94 2.31 1.01 0.35**
Financial security 1.0–8.0 6.27 1.39 4.91 1.66 −0.94**

Notes. Results are pooled estimates across 25 multiply imputed datasets. Prosocial behavior at age 7 was collected with the SSRS and prosocial behavior at age 11 was collected with the SDQ. BF = biological family; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; d = standardized mean difference effect size; OR = odds ratio effect size; *p <0.05, **p <0.01.