Table 2.
Tools to measure patient reported quality of life outcomes.
| Tool | Domains and description | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHOQOL OLD (130–132) | It covers six facets: sensory abilities; autonomy; past, present, and future activities; social participation; death and dying; and intimacy. | Specifically designed for older adults. Covers unique aspects of aging, such as autonomy and social participation. |
Longer than EQ 5D and SF 36. Needs to be administered along with WHOQOL 100 or WHOQOL BREF. |
| ASCOT (Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit) (133) | Has domains which assess individuals’: control over their daily life, personal care, eating habits, living conditions, safety, social situation, leisure time, self-care and health awareness | Assesses access to social services, and social care-related quality of life. | Does not take into consideration disease-specific measures |
| ICECAP-O (ICE pop CAPability measure for Older people) (134) | Five conceptual attributes are assessed: attachment, role in society, enjoyment, security, and control | Focuses on individuals’ own perceptions of their capabilities, rather than providing some notion of an objective assessment of capability (135) | May be more responsive to mental health-related changes than physical health due to the domains assessed. (136) |
EQ-5D, euro-quality of life 5 dimension instrument; SF-36, short form health survey; WHOQOL 100, World Health Organization quality of life 100 questions; WHOQOL BREF, World Health Organization quality of life brief version; WHOQOL OLD, World Health Organization quality of life for older adults.