Table 8.
Direct and indirect effects of FoMO on LB.
| Mindfulness (M ± SD) | Effect | SE | LLCI | ULCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effect | |||||
| – | 0.045 | 0.026 | −0.006 | 0.096 | |
| Conditional and unconditional indirect effects | |||||
| FoMO → SA → LB | |||||
| −9.093 | 0.201 | 0.017 | 0.168 | 0.234 | |
| 0.000 | 0.232 | 0.016 | 0.201 | 0.264 | |
| 9.093 | 0.263 | 0.020 | 0.224 | 0.303 | |
| FoMO → SQ → LB | |||||
| – | 0.035 | 0.007 | 0.023 | 0.049 | |
| FoMO → SA → SQ → LB | |||||
| −9.093 | 0.022 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.028 | |
| 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.003 | 0.019 | 0.032 | |
| 9.093 | 0.029 | 0.004 | 0.021 | 0.037 | |
N = 2,948. Results are adjusted for gender, grade and major. FoMO, Fear of Missing Out; SA, Smartphone Addiction; SQ, Sleep Quality; LB, Learning Burnout; SE, Standard Error; LLCI, Low level confidence interval; ULCI, Upper level confidence interval.