Table 2.
Diagnostic and treatment practices for patients with tinea capitis diagnoses from 2005 to 2021.
| Diagnostic practicesa | All (n = 265)c | Dermatology (n = 132) | Pediatrics (n = 130) | P-value^ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing performed | 153 (57.7%) | 127 (96.2%) | 26 (20.0%) | |
| Fungal culture | 145 (54.7%) | 120 (90.9%) | 25 (19.2%) | |
| Potassium hydroxide preparation | 84 (31.7%) | 84 (63.6%) | 0 | |
| Scalp biopsy | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Wood's lamp | 1 (0.4%) | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | |
| No testing performed | 112 (42.3%)c | 5 (3.8%) | 104 (80.0%) | |
| Deemed not diagnostic after testing | 22 (8.3%) | 15 (11.3%) | 7 (5.4%) | |
| Performed confirmatory testing | 153 (57.7%) | 127 (96.2%) | 26 (20.0%) | p < 0.00001 |
| No confirmatory testing performed | 112 (42.3%)c | 5 (3.8%) | 104 (80.0%) | |
| Treatment practicesb | All (n = 243)c | Dermatology (n = 117) | Pediatrics (n = 123) | |
| Systemic antifungals | 225 (92.6%)c | 113 (96.6%) | 109 (88.6%) | |
| Griseofulvin | 195 (80.2%)c | 85 (72.6%) | 107 (87.0%) | |
| Terbinafine | 36 (14.8%) | 34 (29.1%) | 2 (1.6%) | |
| Itraconazole | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 | |
| Ketoconazole | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 | |
| Fluconazole | 1 (0.4%) | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | |
| Topical antifungals | 82 (33.7%) | 47 (40.2%) | 35 (28.5%) | |
| Ketoconazole | 57 (23.5%) | 39 (33.3%) | 18 (14.6%) | |
| Clotrimazole | 17 (7.0%) | 0 | 17 (13.8%) | |
| Econazole | 4 (1.6%) | 3 (2.6%) | 1 (0.8%) | |
| Terbinafine | 2 (0.8%) | 2 (1.7%) | 0 | |
| Miconazole | 1 (0.4%) | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | |
| Systemic corticosteroids | 2 (0.8%) | 1 (0.9%) | 1 (0.8%) | |
| Topical corticosteroids | 1 (0.4%) | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | |
| Prescribed systemic and/or topical therapy | 225 (92.6%)c | 113 (96.6%) | 109 (88.6%) | p = 0.02 |
| Prescribed topical therapy only | 18 (7.5%) | 4 (3.4%) | 14 (11.4%) |
No encounters utilized polymerase chain reaction testing or antifungal susceptibility testing.
Cases deemed not diagnostic after testing resulted are excluded from this section, as prescribed treatments were discontinued.
Three encounters in which patients were seen by emergency medicine physicians (all prescribed systemic griseofulvin only without confirmatory testing) were included in total count, but excluded from p-value calculations.
P-values were calculated using chi-square tests comparing dermatologists vs. pediatricians.