Table 6.

PROMIS utilization as an outcome metric across total knee arthroplasty studies encompassed in this review

Author	Design	Pt population/intervention	F/U	Primary assessment	Main findings
Shaw et al. [24]	Prospective	TKA versus rTKA	1 month, 4–8 months	Comparison of evidence of improvement MCID in rTKA compared with standard total knee arthroplasty TKA	rTKA demonstrated comparable MCID achievement to standard TKA; no statistically significant difference in MCID achievement between rTKA and standard TKA
Frye et al. [28]	Prospective	TKA: MC versus CR versus PS	3 months, 12 months	Medial congruent polyethylene (MC) effect on patient outcomes after TKA	MC bearing resulted in similar or improved PROMIS, ROM, and patient satisfaction
Melnic et al. [26]	Retrospective	TKA	12 months	Comparison between patient-reported mental health and postoperative physical function following TKA	Patients with worse PROMIS GMH scores had worse PROMIS PF scores before and after surgery
Nwanko et al. [29]	Prospective	TKA	3 months	Preoperative resilience effect on 3-month postoperative outcomes	Resilience predicts postoperative knee function and general physical health in patients undergoing TKA
Lawrie et al. [31]	Retrospective	TKA	12 months	Feasibility and responsiveness of PROMIS in bundle payment care improvement patients undergoing TKA	PROMIS PF domain showed utility in assessing baseline status and changes in PROs over time in patients undergoing TKA, irrespective of insurance status