Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;23:950. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03629-0

Table 3.

Proportional Hazards Modeling OH variables for all pneumonia*

A. Without Adjustment for prior pneumonia or smoking history
Variable Hazard Ratio Lower limit Upper limit p-value
A.A. # of missing teeth
 Best vs Worst 0.65 0.54 0.79  < 0.001
 Moderate vs Worst 0.77 0.64 0.92 0.005
3-group p-value  < 0.001
A.B. % of teeth with PPD ≥ 5 mm
 Best vs Worst 0.93 0.80 1.08 0.335
 Moderate vs Worst 0.79 0.68 0.93 0.005
3-group p-value 0.017
A.C. Clinical Periodontal Status
 Best vs Worst 0.72 0.58 0.90 0.004
 Moderate vs Worst 0.77 0.61 0.95 0.017
3-group p-value 0.008
A.D. % of teeth with restorations
 Best vs Worst 1.21 1.01 1.44 0.038
 Moderate vs Worst 1.04 0.87 1.25 0.652
3-group p-value 0.087
A.E. % of teeth with BOP
 Best vs Worst 0.89 0.77 1.04 0.152
 Moderate vs Worst 0.96 0.82 1.11 0.551
3-group p-value 0.355
B. With Adjustment for pneumonia history and smoking history
Variable Hazard Ratio (lower limit) (upper limit) p-value
B.A # of missing teeth
 Best vs Worst 0.74 0.61 0.91 0.003
 Moderate vs Worst 0.83 0.68 0.99 0.043
3-group p-value 0.010
B.B % of teeth with PPD ≥ 5 mm
 Best vs Worst 0.96 0.82 1.12 0.575
 Moderate vs Worst 0.82 0.70 0.96 0.013
3-group p-value 0.038
B.C. Clinical Periodontal Status
 Best vs Worst 0.78 0.62 0.97 0.029
 Moderate vs Worst 0.82 0.66 1.02 0.074
3-group p-value 0.061
B.D. % of teeth with restorations
 Best vs Worst 1.25 1.05 1.49 0.013
 Moderate vs Worst 1.07 0.89 1.28 0.491
3-group p-value 0.034
B.E. % of teeth with BOP
 Best vs Worst 0.89 0.76 1.03 0.118
 Moderate vs Worst 0.97 0.84 1.13 0.715
3-group p-value 0.262
Without adjustment for prior pneumonia or smoking history
Variable Hazard Ratio Lower Limit Upper Limit p value
C.A # of missing teeth
 Best vs worst 0.71 0.53 0.95 0.021
 Moderate vs worst 0.61 0.45 0.82 0.001
3-group p value 0.003
C.B % of teeth with PPD ≥ 5 mm
 Best vs worst 0.91 0.72 1.16 0.464
 Moderate vs worst 0.85 0.67 1.08 0.189
3-group p value 0.418
C.C. Clinical Periodontal Status
 Best vs worst 0.68 0.47 1.00 0.048
 Moderate vs worst 0.76 0.53 1.09 0.137
3-group p value 0.109
C.D. % of teeth with restorations
 Best vs worst 1.10 0.83 1.46 0.506
 Moderate vs worst 0.99 0.74 1.32 0.921
3-group p value 0.702
C.E. % of teeth with BOP
 Best vs worst 0.74 0.58 0.93 0.011
 Moderate vs worst 0.93 0.75 1.16 0.532
3-group p value 0.033
D. With adjustment for prior pneumonia and smoking history
Variable Hazard Ratio Upper Limit Lower limit p value
3D.A # of missing teeth
 Best vs Worst 0.81 0.60 1.10 0.177
 Moderate vs Worst 0.65 0.48 0.89 0.007
3-group p value 0.025
D.B % of teeth with PPD ≥ 5 mm
 Best vs Worst 0.96 0.76 1.22 0.730
 Moderate vs Worst 0.88 0.69 1.13 0.317
3-group p value 0.600
D.C. Clinical Periodontal Status
 Best vs Worst 0.72 0.49 1.06 0.097
 Moderate vs Worst 0.80 0.55 1.15 0.225
3-group p value 0.217
D.D. % of teeth with restorations
 Best vs Worst 1.15 0.86 1.52 0.346
 Moderate vs Worst 1.02 0.76 1.36 0.889
3-group p value 0.592
D.E. % of teeth with BOP
 Best vs Worst 0.74 0.59 0.94 0.012
 Moderate vs Worst 0.96 0.78 1.19 0.701
3-group p value 0.031

Tables 3 summarizes key study outcomes derived by proportional hazards modeling of OH variables with potential for impacting on pneumonia risk for the following OH variables:

A. Number of missing teeth (MT);

B. Percent of teeth with periodontal pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5 mm

C. AAP periodontal score (11) assigned during dental clinical assessment of periodontal parameters, where scores ≥ III, IV, V indicates PD of increasing severity, respectively;

D. Percent of evaluable teeth with restorations

E. Percent of teeth with bleeding on probing (BOP)

The following outcomes are summarized in Table 3:

(3A) Proportional hazard (PH) modeling outcomes of OH variables (A-E) relative to any incident pneumonia,

(3A.A-E): unadjusted for prior pneumonia;

(3B.A-E): adjusted for prior pneumonia and smoking history

(3C.A-E): PH modeling outcomes of OH variables for CAP subtype, unadjusted for prior pneumonia;

(3D.A-E): PH modeling outcomes of OH variables for CAP subtype adjusted for prior pneumonia and smoking history

PH modeling compared subgroups stratified based on good, intermediate and poor OHS groups for OH variables that contributed significantly to risk for any pneumonia examining both unadjusted data and data adjusted for prior pneumonia and smoking status. Significant p values for OH variables contributing to any pneumonia risk for unadjusted models included: a) number of missing teeth and b) clinical periodontal status. Following adjustment for prior pneumonia and smoking status, only number of missing teeth retained a significant p value

PH modeling of CAP pneumonia comparing groups stratified by good, intermediate and poor OHS identified ‘number of missing teeth’ as the OH variable that exhibited significant p values for CAP risk for both the unadjusted model, and model adjusted for prior pneumonia and smoking