Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;21:93. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00501-4

Table 2.

Base-case cost-effectiveness results from the Chinese healthcare perspective

Cost, CNY QALY ICER, CNY
Total Incremental Total Incremental
PEACE
 Statins 299509.17 NA 8.19 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 348242.12 48732.96 8.54 0.35 137755.18
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 375490.01 75980.84 8.54 0.35 214777.76
BERSONa
 Statins 279123.88 NA 9.64 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 330152.91 51029.03 10.18 0.54 94869.54
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 365284.28 86160.40 10.13 0.49 177450.90
SuValue®, LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl
 Statins 300258.69 NA 8.33 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 324484.37 24225.68 8.92 0.59 40905.80
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 353686.48 53427.79 8.92 0.59 90214.47
SuValue®, LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl
 Statins 284482.16 NA 8.39 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 318921.61 34439.45 8.86 0.48 72449.95
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 347889.94 63407.78 8.86 0.48 133390.36

CNY, Chinese Yuan; Evo 140mgQ2W, evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks; Evo 420mgQM, evolocumab 420 mg monthly; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; NA, not applicable

a: The background statin in the BERSON study was atorvastatin 20 mg/d