Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;21:93. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00501-4

Table 3.

Base-case cost-effectiveness results from the Chinese private payers perspective

Cost, CNY QALY ICER, CNY
Total Incremental Total Incremental
PEACE
 Statins 324863.85 NA 8.19 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 368018.46 43154.61 8.54 0.35 121986.67
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 395266.35 70402.50 8.54 0.35 199009.25
BERSONa
 Statins 306842.49 NA 9.64 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 351529.31 44686.82 10.18 0.54 83078.56
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 387231.89 80389.40 10.13 0.49 165565.29
SuValue®, LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl
 Statins 330228.73 NA 8.33 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 346469.52 16240.78 8.92 0.59 27423.06
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 375671.63 45442.90 8.92 0.59 76731.73
SuValue®, LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl
 Statins 312147.77 NA 8.39 NA NA
 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W 340101.64 27953.87 8.86 0.48 58806.29
 Statins + Evo 420mgQM 369069.97 56922.20 8.86 0.48 119746.70

CNY, Chinese Yuan; Evo 140mgQ2W, evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks; Evo 420mgQM, evolocumab 420 mg monthly; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; NA, not applicable

a: The background statin in the BERSON study was atorvastatin 20 mg/d