Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 30;23:483. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02780-2

Table 2.

Comparison of intra-operative bronchoscope intervention characteristics between group Acute and Non-acute

Group Group Acute (n = 29) Group Non-acute (n = 194) P value
Hemorrhage location 0.872
Location I, n (%) 4(13.8) 27(13.9)
Location II, n (%) 23(79.3) 158(81.4)
Location III, n (%) 2(6.9) 9(4.6)
Cause of Hemorrhage 0.621
Tumor excision, n (%) 19(65.5) 127(65.5)
Biopsy, n (%) 7(24.1) 57(29.4)
Stent extraction and implantation, n (%) 2(6.9) 8(4.1)
Dilation and tearing, n (%) 1(3.4) 2(1.0)
Conventional hemostasis method, n (%) 26(89.7) * 194(100) 0.002
Lung isolation approach
Endotracheal tube isolation, n (%) 8(21.6) * 3(1.5) 0.000
Endoscopic balloon isolation, n (%) 4(23.5) * 3(1.5) 0.006
Intravenous infusion of hemostatic, n (%) 25(86.2) * 73(37.6) 0.000
Blood loss volume, ml 1198.28 ± 913.93* 216.18 ± 162.16 0.000
Duration of therapy, mins 93.90 ± 53.07 * 67.80 ± 28.09 0.000

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or as numbers and percentages. * was statistically significant compared with Group Non-acute

Location I: hemorrhage lesions were located in the main airway; Location II: hemorrhage lesions were located in the left/right mainstem bronchus; Location III: hemorrhage lesions were located both in the main airway and mainstem bronchus

Group Acute: bronchoscope-related acute massive airway hemorrhage group; Group Non-acute: bronchoscope-related non-acute massive airway hemorrhage group