Table 2.
Performance comparison on D0 dataset.
| Methods | Backbone | Acc | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-trained ResNet-50* (He et al., 2016) | ResNet-50 | 99.4 | 99.4 |
| Pre-trained DenseNet-169* (Huang et al., 2017) | DenseNet-169 | 99.6 | 99.6 |
| MMAL* (Zhang et al., 2021) | ResNet-50 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| Ours (general branch) | ResNet-50 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| CNNs Ensemble + Exp + ExpLR (Nanni et al., 2022) |
EfficientNetB0 + ResNet-50 + GoogleNet + ShuffleNet + MobileNetV2 + DenseNet-201 |
99.8 | 99.7 |
| MMALNet + DNVT + ResNet-50 + Ensemble (Xia et al., 2023) |
ResNet-50 + DenseNet-201 + Transformer | 99.9 | 99.9 |
| Ours (improving branch) | ResNet-50 | 100 | 100 |
The bolded lines are the results obtained by our method, to emphasize.