Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;24:933. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07054-w

Table 4.

Comparisons of the measurement parameters between the PCL injured groups with and without PD

Variable PCL injured with PD (n = 11) PCL injured without PD (n = 81) P value
Patellar lateral tilt, deg 13.56 ± 5.70 13.14 ± 4.97 0.089
Congruence angle, deg -8.54 ± 6.21 -12.72 ± 5.61 0.078
Patellar height, CDI 1.39 ± 0.17 1.09 ± 0.25 0.009
Hip–knee–ankle angle, deg 179.87 ± 2.76 179.70 ± 3.00 0.659
Lateral trochlear inclination, deg 11.54 ± 5.41 20.49 ± 4.15 0.245
Trochlear facet asymmetry 0.40 ± 0.14 0.65 ± 0.13 0.736
Intercondylar notch width, mm 19.35 ± 3.19 20.44 ± 2.87 0.465
Bicondylar width, mm 74.37 ± 6.27 76.21 ± 6.65 0.134
Notch width index 0.27 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 0.02 0.086
Intercondylar notch angle, deg 61.93 ± 7.39 60.84 ± 6.89 0.055
Trochlear sulcus angle, deg 157.70 ± 8.77 141.80 ± 8.78 < 0.001
Trochlear sulcus depth, mm 3.10 ± 1.20 5.11 ± 1.48 0.003
Lateral femoral condyle ratio 0.63 ± 0.53 0.65 ± 0.63 0.658
Medial femoral condyle ratio 0.64 ± 0.43 0.63 ± 0.61 0.320

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation

Bold indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05)

PD, patellar dislocation; CDI, Caton-Deschamps Index