Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13065-023-01083-1

Table 1.

Regression and validation parameters of the proposed HPLC and HPTLC methods for determination of MIC, NYS, and MET

Parameters HPLC HPTLC
MIC NYS MET MIC NYS MET
Linearity 5–50 μg/mL 4–50 μg/mL 4–40 μg/mL 0.4–2 μg/band 0.4–2.2 μg/band 0.4–2 μg/band
Slope 13.9680 4.3515 28.2340 0.4762 0.8460 1.102
Intercept − 0.9486 193.2800 3.8488 0.2186 − 0.2224 0.4583
Correlation coefficient 0.9999 0.9999 0.9999 0.9999 0.9998 0.9999
Accuracy (%) 100.41 100.42 99.19 99.53 100.28 100.00
Repeatability (RSD%)a 0.17 0.62 0.61 0.80 0.49 0.77
Intermediate Precision (RSD%)b 0.71 0.82 0.66 1.33 0.67 1.69
LODc 1.19 μg/mL 0.95 μg/mL 0.80 μg/mL 0.11 μg/band 0.09 μg/band 0.07 μg/band
LOQc 3.62 μg/mL 2.87 μg/mL 2.43 μg/mL 0.34 μg/band 0.27 μg/band 0.22 μg/band

aThe intraday precision (n = 3), average of three different concentrations repeated three times within day

bThe interday precision (n = 3), average of three different concentrations repeated three times in three successive days

cLimit of detection and quantitation are determined via calculations: LOD = (SD of the response/slope) × 3.3; LOQ = (SD of the response/slope) × 10