Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 10;11(1):e200179. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200179

Table 2.

Findings of Studies Reporting Neuropsychological Testing in Patients With Anti-NMDA-R AE

graphic file with name NXI-2023-000401t2.jpg

Domain/test Studies Total N Summary of findings
Verbal memory
 Word list 10 191 C: Worse Imm (3/5), Delay (3/5), Rec (1/1), unspecified (1/1); N: Worse Imm (1/2), Delay (2/2); I: Imm: 25% (z < −1; k = 1), 25–30% (z < −1.5; k = 2), Delay: 37.5% (z < −1, k = 1), 0–50% (z < −1.5, k = 2), 20% (z < −2, k = 1), Rec: 31.3% (k = 1)
 Stories 2 17 C: Worse Imm, Delay; N.d. Rec (1/1); N: Worse Imm, Delay (1/1); I: 0% Imm, 22% Delay (k = 1)
 Word pairs 1 7 C: Worse Imm, Delay, Rec
Visual memory
 Complex figure 2 50 C: Worse Delay (1/2), Rec (1/1), N.d. Imm (1/1)
 BVMT 1 24 C: Worse unspecified (1/2)
 AFLT 1 5 C: N.d. Imm, Delay, Rec
 DMS 1 8 C: Impaired (z < −2): 12.5% Color, 50% Location, 63% Association
 PAL 1 15 N: Worse
Attention
 Digit span 10 149 C: Worse Forward (3/5), Backward (5/5), Total (1/1); I: 27%–33% Total, 0% Forward, 0% Backward (z < −1.5, k = 3); 38.5% Forward, 30.8% Backward (z < −1; k = 1)
 PASAT 1 24 C: Worse
 Block tapping 5 79 C: Worse Total (1/1); N.d. Forward or Backward (1/1); N:Worse (1/1); I: 0% Total, 29% Forward
 Reaction time 1 11 N: N.d.
 Selective 2 25 N: Worse RT, Variability; I: 0–20% Selective, 20–40% Sustained (z < −1.5, k = 2); 63% Fluctuations (z < −2, k = 1)
 Sustained 1 28 C: N.d.
 Divided 1 44 C: Worse
Processing speed
 Sequencing 4 61 C: Worse (2/3); I: 0% (es < 1; k = 1)
 Coding 6 74 C: Worse (3/3); N: N.d. (1/1); I: 27–50% (z < −1.5; k = 2); 67% (es < 9; k = 1)
 Symbol search 1 10 N: N.d.; I: 40% (z < −1.5)
 Stroop (color) 4 55 C: Worse (3/4)
Language
 Naming 5 58 C: N.d. (2/2); N:Worse (1/1); I: 14–25% (k = 2)
 Semantic knowledge 1 7 C: N.d.
 Fluency-phonemic 8 86 C: Worse (1/2); N: Worse (1/1); I: 0–38% (z < −1.5; k = 3), 20% (z < −1; k = 1)
 Fluency-semantic 9 136 C: Worse (3/5); N: N.d. (1/1); I: 0% (z < −1.5; k = 3), 25% (z < −1; k = 1)
 Fluency-switching 2 17 C: N.d. (1/1); N: N.d. (1/1), I: 0%
 Vocabulary 2 27 N: N.d. (1/1), I: 7% (z < −1.5), 33% (z < −1)
 Comprehension 1 16 N: Worse
Visuospatial
 Figure copy 4 28 C: Worse (1/1); I: 0–25% (z < −1.5), 11% (unclear threshold)
 VMI 2 21 I: 29% (ws < 85), 14.3% (z < −1)
 Block construction 3 26 C: N.d. (1/1); N: Worse (1/1); I: 17% (z < −1.5), 67% (ws < 9)
Executive
 Switching 3 31 C: N.d. (2/2); I: 50% (es < 1)
 Stroop inhibition 5 85 C: Worse (2/5)
 Go/No-Go 1 44 C: Worse
 Reasoning 5 46 C: N.d. (1/1); N: N.d. (1/1); I: 0–31% (z < −1.5, k = 3), 8.3% (z < −1, k = 1)
 Executive control 1 40 C: Worse
 Planning 5 68 C: N.d. Total (2/2), More rule violations (1/1); N: N.d. (1/1); I: 44% (k = 2)
 Abstraction 1 7 C: N.d.
 Initiation 1 7 C: N.d.
 Problem solving 1 15 C: Worse
 Set-shifting 1 14 N: N.d.

Abbreviations: AFLT = Aggies figural learning test; BVMT = brief visuospatial memory test; C = comparison to controls; DMS = delayed matching to sample; es = equivalence score; I = Normative Impairment; Imm = Immediate; N = comparison to Normative data; N.d. = no difference; PAL = paired associate learning; PASAT = paced auditory serial addition test; rec = Recognition; VMI = visual-motor integration; ws = weighted score.

Worse denotes statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between patients and controls; Normative Impairment reported using a cut-off score of z < −1.5 unless otherwise specified; Total Studies indicates the total number of studies reporting each test; Unique Samples indicates the number of nonoverlapping samples used for synthesis; Total Patients indicates the total number of patients included in the synthesis and is the sum of the patients in the nonoverlapping samples; k denotes number of studies.