Table 2.

Prompt for conclusion identification using few shot learning strategy.

In this task, you will be given a text and your goal is to classify the text as either “conclusion” or “non-conclusion” based on the definitions below. The texts are from the Decisions and Judgements categories of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
“conclusion”: In the context of argumentation in case law, a “conclusion” is the final decision or judgment made by the Commission or Court. It is often supported by one or more non-conclusions. The conclusion is the result of the argumentative process and is the central point that the argument is trying to establish.
“non-conclusion”: In the context of argumentation in case law, a “non-conclusion” refers to the statements, facts, or assertions that provide the basis/reason for a conclusion. They are the reasons given to support the final decision of the Commission or Court. They form the building blocks of the argumentative structure leading to the conclusion.
Below are examples of texts that are correctly classified as “conclusion”/“non-conclusion”.
[EXAMPLES WITH LABELS ARE INSERTED HERE]
Text to classify:[TEST_TEXT]
Classification: