. 2023 Nov 28;11:e16413. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16413

Table 2. Static allometry: 99% confidence interval (lower limit, LL, and upper limit, UL) of slope of reduced major axis (RMA) regression analysis and correlation (P-value and R²) of male and female genital characteristics on body size proxy ( $\sqrt{c a r a p a c e a r e a}$ , SCA) in A. lobata.

LL and UL values in bold indicate slope ⁄ = 1. P-value and R² in bold indicate a significant positive correlation between SCA and genital trait at the p < 0.01 level.

Body size vs genital characteristics	LL	UL	P	R²	n
Median septum length vs female SCA	0.99	2.02	0.013	0.12	50
Median septum width vs female SCA	1.19	2.51	0.023	0.03	50
Pedipalp apophysis area vs male SCA	0.89	1.73	<0.001	0.29	47
Spur length vs male SCA	0.89	1.93	0.066	0.07	47

Table 2. Static allometry: 99% confidence interval (lower limit, LL, and upper limit, UL) of slope of reduced major axis (RMA) regression analysis and correlation (P-value and R2) of male and female genital characteristics on body size proxy (carapacearea, SCA) in A. lobata.

Table 2. Static allometry: 99% confidence interval (lower limit, LL, and upper limit, UL) of slope of reduced major axis (RMA) regression analysis and correlation (P-value and R²) of male and female genital characteristics on body size proxy ( $\sqrt{c a r a p a c e a r e a}$ , SCA) in A. lobata.