TABLE 2.
The advantages and limitations of responsive scaffold categories.
| Scaffold categories | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature-responsive | Controllable and easy to operate | Temperature ranges are limited |
| Light-responsive | Little harm to the human body; No direct contact with the lesion area | Penetration depths are either too shallow or too deep; The biological safety of light-sensitive materials need to evaluate |
| Electric-responsive | Responds quickly and with strong sensitivity | Further investigation is required to examine the alterations in electric field intensity and frequency within organisms |
| Mechanical-responsive | Sensitive and quick to react | Potential toxicity resulting from the use of crosslinking agents |
| Magnetic-responsive | Controllable from an external source | The diffusion rate of magnetic particles is high; There exists a potential for toxicity |
| Ultrasound-responsive | The system can be controlled externally | The controllability of penetration depth is limited; It generates a thermal effect |
| pH-responsive | Utilizing the distinctions between diseased and normal tissue | Limited range of variation; Low sensitivity |
| Redox-responsive | Utilizing the distinctions between diseased and normal tissue | The sensitivity is relatively low |
| Enzyme-responsive | Distinctive biological targeting and catalytic attributes | Different types of enzymes may exhibit cross-reactivity |