Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;14:921–942. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28539

Table 6. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as a risk factor for arm morbidity following breast cancer treatments.

Disability Author N Follow-up Measure Comparison/Comments P-value OR/HR CI (95%) Type of evidence Evidence level
Lymphedema Ashikaga 2010 [37] 3,963 36 months Water displacement <0.001 OR = 1.90 RCT 1B
Del Bianco 2007 [82] 341 24 months ALND vs. SLNB 0.01 OR = 0.48 0.25–1.06 RCT 1B
Kilbreat 2016 [53] 450 18 months Circumference and Bioimpedance spectroscopy >13 lymph nodes 0.07 OR = 2.1 0.9–4.9 Prospective cohort study 2B
Kwan 2010 [49] 997 20.9 months Examination by a specialist No. of dissected lymph nodes HR = 1.04 1.02–1.07 Prospective cohort study 2B
Dominick 2013 [61] 2,431 6 years Norman and colleagues’ validated telephone lymphedema questionnaire <0.01 OR = 2.08 1.66–2.60 Prospective cohort study 2B
Park 2008 [63] 450 24 months Tape measure 0.008 OR = 6.61 1.64–26.57 Prospective study 2B
Kuijer 2021 [17] 1,037 1 year CARES-SF <0.01 OR = 3.6 Multicenter prospective cohort study 2B
Smoot 2010 [104] 144 Circumference and bioimpedance <0.005 −7.18–-2.43 Prospective longitudinal study 2B
Sagen 2014 [83] 391 2.5 years Water Displacement ALND vs. SLNB 0.05 Prospective study 2B
Blanchard 2003 [86] 1,253 12 months Self-reported ALND vs. SLNB <0.001 Prospective study 2B
Belmonte 2018 [87] 112 5 years Circumference ALND vs. SLNB <0.001 45.8–257.3 Prospective study 2B
Langer 2007 [81] 635 60 months Circumference <0.0001 OR = 0.15 0.08–0.28 Prospective study 2B
Zou 2018 [47] 387 24 months Circumference and Norman questionnaire 16><16 lymph nodes 0.09 HR = 5.2 1.6–17.3 Prospective study 2B
Yen 2009 [89] 1,338 4 years Self-reported More than 5 nodes <0.001 OR = 2.11 4.68–5.61 Population cohort study 2B
Norman 2009 [105] 631 5 years Self-reported HR = 2.61 1.77–3.84 Prospective study 2B
Chan 2009 [41] 5 years Arm circumference 0.003 OR = 2.97 1.46–6.03 Matched case-control study 3B
Herremans 2021 [43] 132 5 years Arm circumference and bioimpedance spectroscopy LYMPHA technique vs. ALND 0.036 OR = 0.39 0.16–0.94 Retrospective cross-sectional study 4
Owusu 2019 [78] 313 - - 0.008 A descriptive retrospective survey 4
Kim 2013 [79] 772 8.3 years Circumference measurements <0.001 HR = 2.81 Retrospective study 4
Mccredie 2001 [56] 809 Self-report OR = 2.4 1.0–5.6 Population-based case-control study 4
Rebegea 2015 [80] 305 >25 nodes <0.001 OR = 4.88 2.25–10.58 Cross-sectional study 4
16–25 nodes <0.001 OR = 1.85 1.27–2.75
Da Costa Vieira 2016 [3] 622 10 years Self-report For ≥ 15 lymph nodes 0.017 HR = 9.12 1.15–72.12 Retrospective study 4
Ahmed 2011 [71] 1,287 Self-report OR = 3.52 1.32–9.34 Cross-sectional study 4
Gärtner 2010 [36] 3,104 Self-report <0.0001 OR = 2.89 2.42–3.45 Cross-sectional study 4
Crosby 2012 [58] 1,117 From medical records <0.001 OR = 6.69 2.59–17.29 Retrospective study 4
Meeske 2009 [35] 494 50 months Self-report of lymphedema 10 or more lymph nodes OR = 2.16 1.12–4.17 A case-control study 4
Langer 2007 [81] 635 60 months VAS <0.0001 OR = 0.33 0.20–0.54 Prospective study 2B
Persistent pain Kramer 2019 [73] 349 SPADI questionnaire OR = 0.48 0.23–0.98 Cross-sectional study 4
Mejdahl 2013 [27] 2,411 Developed questionnaire <0.001 OR = 2.04 1.60–2.61 Cross-sectional study 4
Chiang 2019 [74] 201 NPRS and Brief Pain Inventory 0.03 OR = 4.33 1.19–15.73 Retrospective cross-sectional study 4
Functional disabilities Del Bianco 2007 [82] 341 24 months - ALND vs. SLNB at 6 months 0.005 OR = 0.47 0.27–0.79 RCT 1B
Habib 2020 [92] 44 6 weeks QuickDASH disability score 0.010 Prospective cohort 2B
Hayes 2010 [39] 287 18 months QuickDASH and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Breast questionnaire 0.02 OR = 4.81 1.64–14.14 Prospective study 2B
Kramer 2019 [73] 349 SPADI questionnaire OR = 0.99 0.54–1.81 Cross-sectional study 4
Decreased range of motion Ashikaga 2010 [37] 3,963 36 months <0.001 OR = 1.54 RCT 1B
Nesvold 2008 [48] 263 47 months British Columbia Cancer Agency in Canada 0.01 OR = 0.92 0.85–0.98 Prospective study 2B
Langer 2007 [81] 635 60 months ROM measurements 0.0002 OR = 0.22 0.15–0.56 Prospective study 2B
Hack 2010 [59] 316 12 months Volume measurements 0.003 OR = 3.62 8.48–1.54 Cross-sectional study 4
Ahmed 2011 [71] 1,287 Self-report OR = 2.38 1.41–4.03 Cross-sectional study 4

Abbreviations: N: number; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; HR: hazard ratio; ALND: axillary lymph node dissection; SLNB: sentinel lymph node biopsy; VAS: visual analog scale; ROM: range of motion; RCT: randomize control trail.