Table 3.

Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Multivariate Models Testing Concurrent and Prospective Associations Between Minority Stress and IPV Victimization

		Type of IPV Victimization
Predictor	Level	Psychological	Physical	Sexual	Coercive Control	SGM-Specific
SGM Victimization	Within Concurrent	1.32 [1.02,1.70]	1.16 [0.95,1.42]	1.11 [0.79,1.55]	1.17 [0.98,1.40]	1.12 [0.91,1.37]
	Within Prospective	1.19 [0.94,1.50]	0.96 [0.78,1.19]	0.83 [0.54,1.27]	1.11 [0.92,1.33]	0.93 [0.64,1.35]
	Between	2.01 [1.30,3.10]	1.77 [1.16,2.69]	1.59 [1.18,2.14]	1.28 [0.92,1.78]	2.24 [1.47,3,42]
Microaggressions	Within Concurrent	1.38 [1.12,1.71]	1.20 [0.95,1.50]	1.34 [0.94,1.91]	1.48 [1.20,1.83]	1.30 [1.00,1.70]
	Within Prospective	1.03 [0.84,1.25]	1.20 [0.94,1.52]	1.34 [0.81,2.23]	1.10 [0.89,1.37]	1.52 [1.01,2.28]
	Between	1.95 [1.33,2.87]	1.52 [1.00,2.31]	1.15 [0.73,1.81]	1.69 [1.17,2.43]	1.31 [0.81,2.12]
Internalized heterosexism	Within Concurrent	1.23 [0.89,1.71]	1.11 [0.71,1.75]	1.87 [0.66,5.33]	1.30 [0.88,1.92]	1.02 [0.42,2.48]
	Within Prospective	1.00 [0.66,1.52]	1.34 [0.75,2.39]	0.70 [0.26,1.90]	1.37 [0.88,2.11]	1.91 [0.78,4.66]
	Between	0.86 [0.55,1.33]	1.11 [0.64,1.97]	1.54 [0.82,2.90]	1.27 [0.77,2.08]	1.65 [0.80,3.41]

Note. IPV = intimate partner violence. SGM = sexual and gender minority. Models included all three minority stress variables predicting each IPV outcome. All models were estimated controlling for age at baseline, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Statistically significant associations (p < .05) are in bold text, using p-values adjusted with the Benjamini and Hochberg correction.