Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2017 Jul 10;80(1):219–238. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12425

Table 4.

Propensity Score Matching Models Estimating Parenting Outcomes as a Function of Mother’s and Father’s Health Limitations, by Residential Status

Mother’s health limitations
Father’s health limitations
Co-residential Non-residential z Co-residential Non-residential z
                                                             
Panel A. Mother-reported outcomes                                                            
 Parenting stress 0.026 (0.108) 0.201 (0.067) ** −1.38 −0.066 (0.085) 0.028 (0.059) −0.91
 Cooperation in parenting −0.032 (0.040) −0.102 (0.061) ^ 0.96 0.005 (0.039) −0.064 (0.055) 1.02
 Engagement −0.101 (0.087) −0.005 (0.074) −0.84 0.023 (0.082) −0.056 (0.063) 0.76
                                                               
N 1,342 2,034 1,342 2,034    
                                                               
Panel B. Father-reported outcomes                                                            
 Parenting stress 0.002 (0.117) −0.100 (0.107) 0.64 0.280 (0.102) ** 0.280 (0.106) ** 0.00
 Cooperation in parenting 0.011 (0.062) −0.014 (0.120) 0.19 −0.095 (0.048) ^ −0.212 (0.114) ^ 0.95
 Engagement −0.019 (0.085) −0.125 (0.115) 0.74 −0.043 (0.080) −0.119 (0.107) ^ 0.57
                                                               
N 1,133 1,068 1,133 1,068        

Notes: Doubly robust estimates presented. Each row represents a separate outcome variable. All outcome variables are standardized (mean = 1, standard deviation = 0). All covariates from Table 1 are included in the matching equation. The treatment group N varies across multiply imputed data sets. z indicates z-score comparing co-residential and non-residential couples.

^

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01.