Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Oct 11;80(20):1925–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.750

TABLE 4.

Clinical Considerations for the Use of Noninvasive Testing for Coronary Artery Disease

Ischemia Test Modality Strengths Limitations Patient Considerations Favoring Its Use
Exercise stress ECG
  • Low cost

  • Wide availability

  • Assessment of exercise symptoms, capacity

  • No ionizing radiation

  • Decreased accuracy compared with anatomical and stress-imaging tests

  • Requires interpretable ECG and ability to exercise sufficiently

  • Rarely recommended as a stand-alone test due to frequent known CAD, inability to exercise, or significant arrhythmias

Stress echocardiography
  • Wide availability

  • High diagnostic specificity

  • Assessment of ventricular and valvular function

  • No ionizing radiation

  • Decreased sensitivity compared with anatomical and other stress-imaging tests

  • Dependent on good image quality

  • Requires dobutamine in patients unable to exercise

  • Known good image quality and ability to exercise

  • Consider use of an ultrasound-enhancing agent to improve endocardial visualization

  • Known moderate or severe valvular disease

Stress/rest SPECT
  • Wide availability

  • Relatively high diagnostic sensitivity

  • Assessment of ventricular function

  • Increased artifacts resulting in nondiagnostic results and decreased diagnostic accuracy compared with stress/rest PET

  • Radiation exposure

  • Known CAD or high CAC burden on chest CT imaging

  • Preferred over stress echocardiography in patients who cannot exercise or who do not have significant bronchospastic disease

Stress/rest PET
  • High diagnostic accuracy

  • Lower radiation exposure than SPECT

  • Measures myocardial blood flow and flow reserve

  • Assessment of ventricular function

  • Limited availability

  • Relatively higher cost

  • Lack of exercise assessment

  • Known CAD or high CAC burden on chest CT imaging

  • Preferred over SPECT due to higher diagnostic accuracy and lower rate of nondiagnostic test results

Stress CMR
  • High diagnostic accuracy

  • Accurate assessment of chamber sizes, ventricular and valvular function

  • Diagnosis of prior infarction, scar, fibrosis

  • Measurement of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve is possible but not widely available currently

  • No ionizing radiation

  • Limited availability

  • Relatively higher cost

  • Lack of exercise assessment

  • Long scan acquisition times

  • Claustrophobia

  • Often not immediately available to patients with pacemakers or ICDs

  • Contraindicated in patients with significant renal dysfunction

  • Known CAD and/or cardiomyopathy

  • Elevated troponin not thought to be secondary to ACS

  • Known moderate or severe valvular disease

  • No significant renal dysfunction

CTA
  • High diagnostic accuracy

  • Does not require exercise

  • Identifies nonobstructive CAD

  • Radiation exposure

  • Lack of exercise assessment

  • Contraindicated in patients with significant renal dysfunction

  • Blooming artifacts when significant coronary calcification present

  • Atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias

  • May require beta-blockade

  • Incidental noncardiac findings

  • No known CAD

  • Absence of severe coronary calcification

  • Prior normal, mildly abnormal, or inconclusive stress test results

  • No known iodinated contrast medium allergy or significant renal dysfunction

  • Low likelihood of high-quality stress testing or lack of timely access

ACS = acute coronary syndrome CAC = coronary artery calcium; CAD = coronary artery disease; CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance; CT = computed tomography; CTA = computed tomography angiography; ECG = electrocardiogram; ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; PET = positron emission tomography; SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography.