Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 21;62(12):3849–3857. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead127

Table 3.

Frequency and reasons for discontinuing etanercept therapy, including the sensitivity analysis results

Etanercept originator Sensitivity analysisa Etanercept biosimilar
Total 1009 1009 797
Follow-up in BSRBR-RA since registration, years 5.0 (3.4–6.2) 5.0 (3.4–6.2) 2.7 (1.8–4.0)
One-year Kaplan–Meier drug survival (%) (95% CI) 68 (65, 71) 71 (68, 74) 76 (73, 79)
Discontinued treatment, n (%) 819 (81) 530 (53) 330 (41)
Time to discontinuation, months 18 (7–41) 11 (5–26) 10 (5–18)
Reasons for treatment discontinuation, n (% of whole cohort)
 Ineffectiveness 208 (21) 208 (21) 158 (20)
 Adverse events including deaths 219 (22) 219 (22) 108 (14)
 Remission 3 (<1) 3 (<1) 6 (1)
 Switched to a biosimilar 189 (19)
 Otherb 65 (6) 65 (6) 39 (5)
 Missing 35 (3) 35 (3) 19 (2)
Discontinuation
 Unadjusted [HR (95% CI)] 1.69 (1.48, 1.92)* 1.21 (1.05, 1.39)* [base]
 Propensity decile adjustedc [HR (95% CI)] 1.62 (1.41, 1.85)* 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) [base]

All values are n (%), or median (interquartile range), unless stated otherwise.

a

Sensitivity analysis for the etanercept originator cohort to censor patients who switched to a biosimilar.

b

Other reasons for treatment discontinuations were unique to the patient.

c

Adjusted by propensity deciles—baseline variables in the propensity score included age, gender, ethnicity, disease duration, smoking status, BMI, number of comorbidities, joint surgery history, anti-CCP positivity, RF positivity, baseline MTX use, baseline steroid use, baseline conventional synthetic DMARD use, number of previous conventional synthetic DMARDs, DAS of 28-joints score, swollen joint count, tender joint count, CRP, ESR, patient’s global assessment and HAQ score.

*

P < 0.05. BSRBR-RA: British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA; HR: hazard ratio.