Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 24;52(12):992–1004. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04367-5

Table 3.

Comparison of bone density and hand grip strength between groups

Overall
n = 346
Men
n = 70
Women
n = 276
p-valueM No VFs
n = 193
VFs
n = 153
p-valueM BDD
n = 139
BDI
n = 207
p-valueM
Baseline
BMD (T-score at LS) −3.2 (−3.7 to −2.6) −3.3 (−4.0 to −2.6) −3.2 (−3.7 to −2.6) 0.186 −3.1 (−3.6 to −2.5) −3.3 (−3.9 to −2.7) 0.009 −3.0 (−3.4 to −2.5) −3.4 (−3.8 to −2.8) <0.001M
HGS (kg) 26.0 (21.0–32.0) 42.0 (35.5–50.0) 24.0 (20.0–28.0) <0.001 26.0 (22.0–32.0) 26.0 (20.0–33.0) 0.514 26.0 (22.0–33.0) 26.0 (21.0–32.0) 0.433
Follow-up
BMD (T-score at LS) −3.1 (−3.5 to −2.9) −3.0 (−3.3 to −2.8) −3.1 (−3.5 to −2.9) 0.265 −3.1 (−3.3 to −2.9) −3.1 (−3.6 to −2.9) 0.118 −3.2 (−3.6 to −3.0) −3.0 (−3.4 to −2.6) <0.001
HGS (kg) 24.0 (20.0–31.0) 36.0 (28.0–46.0) 23.0 (20.0–28.0) <0.001 25.0 (20.5–30.5) 24.0 (20.0–32.0) 0.719 26.0 (20.0–31.0) 24.0 (20.0–31.5) 0.473

Data are expressed as medians with the 1st and 3rd quartiles (QI–QIII), Mann-Whitney U testM

BMD bone mineral density, HGS hand grip strength, BDD bone density decrease, BDI bone density increase, VFs Vertebral fractures, LS lumbar spine