Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 24;192(6):2697–2706. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03341-6

Table 4.

Comparison of time-domain features among BNP level groups

Feature types Time-domain features Group 1 (n = 249) Group 2 (n = 85) Group 3 (n = 85) χ2 P value
Duration feature t5 0.413 (0.341,0.489) 0.443 (0.376, 0.509) 0.391 (0.317, 0.470)∆∆ 9.245 0.010
T 0.761 (0.680, 0.843) 0.796 (0.726, 0.857) 0.717 (0.643, 0.846)∆∆ 9.460 0.009
Proportional feature h4/h1 0.478 (0.412, 0.530) 0.468 (0.412, 0.518) 0.419 (0.380, 0.503)** 10.651 0.005
t1/T 0.190 (0.169, 0.214) 0.183 (0.164, 0.205) 0.200 (0.175, 0.223) 7.859 0.020
w1 0.191 (0.170, 0.213) 0.196 (0.165, 0.222) 0.183 (0.135, 0.209)* 8.600 0.014
w2 0.143 (0.122, 0.165) 0.148 (0.115, 0.172) 0.130 (0.100, 0.161) 8.337 0.015
w1/T 0.255 (0.229, 0.279) 0.250 (0.217, 0.275) 0.240 (0.209, 0.266)** 10.522 0.005
w2/T 0.189 (0.167, 0.214) 0.185 (0.159, 0.213) 0.175 (0.149, 0.199)* 6.787 0.034

Data shown are M (Q1, Q3)

*compared with Group 1, P < 0.05; **compared with Group 1, P < 0.01; compared with Group 2, P < 0.05; ∆∆compared with Group 2, P < 0.01