Table 2.
Test quality of the examined triage algorithms for the detection of a condition according to triage category T2 (yellow). The higher the sensitivity, the lower the undertriage and the higher the specificity, the lower the overtriage
| Triage category T2 (color: yellow) |
BER | ESI | MTS | JorD | PETRA | PRIOR | mSTaRT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.13 | |
| Specificity | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.75 | 0.99 | 0.81 | |
| PPV | 0.52 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.83 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.16 | |
| NPV | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.77 | |
| Youden index | 0.28 | 0.00 | −0.11 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.06 | |
| Overtriage | 35.6% | 33.3% | 2.2% | 40.0% | 4.4% | 51.1% | 24.4% | |
| Undertriage | 26.7% | 44.4% | 82.2% | 48.9% | 68.9% | 46.7% | 62.2% | |
| Algorithm steps | Correct | 10 [9–14] | 2 [2–2] | 5 [5–5] | 9 [9–9] | 8 [8–8] | 7 [7-7] | 6 [6–6] |
| Overtriage | 3 [2–3] | 1 [1–1] | 4 [4–4] | 4 [2–4] | 6 [6–6] | 5 [3–5] | 5 [3–5] | |
| Undertriage | 17 [17–17] | 4 [4–4.5] | 1 [1–1] | 11 [11–11] | 1 [1–1] | 8 [8–8] | 1 [1–1] | |
| Overall | 9 [3–17] | 2 [1–5] | 1 [1–5] | 9 [4–11] | 1 [1–8] | 6 [5–8] | 1 [1–6] | |
Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). The Youden index [32] combines sensitivity and specificity in one value and increases with the discriminatory power of the algorithms. BER Berlin secondary triage Algorithm [24], JorD Jordanian-German Project Hospital Algorithm [27], MTS Manchester Triage System MCI Module [22], ESI Emergency Severity Index [23]. Primary triage algorithms: PETRA Prehospital Emergency Triage Rapid Algorithm [28], PRIOR Primary Ranking for Initial Orientation in Emergency Services [26], mSTaRT Modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment [16]