Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;192(6):2581–2593. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03336-3

Table 3.

Methods reported by participants to measure and monitor patient safety in Irish hospitals

Dimension No Reported methods of measuring and monitoring safety Number of participants reported the measure (no.) %
(18) 87.5%
Front-line healthcare staff
(6) 12.5%
Policy makers
(24) 100%
All
1. Harm 1. Incident reporting systems (15) 83.3% (4) 66.6% (19) 79.2%
2. National Incident Management System (NIMS) - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
3. Hospital-acquired complications - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
4. Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
5.  Mortality and morbidity rates (5) 27.8% - (5) 20.8%
6. Patient safety indicators (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
7. Incidence of falls (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
8. Pressure ulcer rates (3) 16.7% - (3) 12.5%
9. State Claims Agency (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
10. Medication error reporting (3) 16.7% - (3) 12.5%
11. Rates of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) (1) 5.5% (1) 16.6% (2) 8.3%
12. Readmission rates (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
13. Patient satisfaction surveys - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
14. Patients’ complaint systems (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
2. Reliability of safety critical processes  1. Monitoring compliance to hand hygiene (1) 5.5% (2) 33.3% (3) 12.5%
 2. Observation of safety critical behaviours (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
 3. Monitoring national standards (5) 27.8% (1) 16.6% (6) 25%
 4. National/international accreditation (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 5. Inspections to monitor compliance against standards and guideline (4) 22.2% (1) 16.6% (5) 20.8%
 6. Venous thromboembolism risk assessment (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 7. Key performance indicators of patient safety goals (3) 16.7% (1) 16.6% (4) 16.7%
 8. Audit of equipment (6) 33.3% - (6) 25%
 9. Infection control checklists (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 10. Clinical audit (14) 77.8% (4) 66.6% (18) 75%
 11. Patient observation charts (4) 22.2% - (4) 16.7%
12.  Double checks by other staff members (7) 38.9% - (7) 29.2%
 13. Monitoring of vital signs (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 14. Quality and safety monthly governance meeting - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 15. Patient administration systems - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 16. Specialty-specific data management systems - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 17. Turnaround times (TAT) - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 18. Early warning score (6) 33.3% (2) 33.3% (8) 33.3%
 19. Armbands to identify patients at risk (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 20. Surgical checklist (3) 16.7% - (3) 12.5%
 21. Systems to check bed availability (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 22. Preoperative assessment clinic (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 23. Medication administration checklists (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 24. Staff assessment and credentialling (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 25. Monitoring delays in treatment (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
3. Sensitivity to operations  1. Safety walk-arounds (5) 27.8% (1) 16.6% (6) 25%
 2. Talking to patients (3) 16.7% - (3) 12.5%
 3. Safety huddles (4) 22.2% (2) 33.3% (6) 25%
 4. Briefings and debriefings (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
 5. Observation and conversations with clinical teams (7) 38.9% (1) 16.6% (8) 33.3%
 6. Ward rounds and routine reviews of patients and working conditions (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
 7. Handover and handouts (4) 22.2% - (4) 16.7%
 8. Real-time monitoring and feedback in anaesthesia (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
4. Anticipation and preparedness  1. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to identify risks (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 2. Staff assessment and credentialing (3) 16.7% - (3) 12.5%
 3. Risk registers - (4) 66.6% (4) 16.7%
 4. Anticipated staffing levels and skill mix (7) 38.9% - (7) 29.2%
 5. Screening for embolism (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 6. Timely safety alerts - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 7. Comprehensive hazard identification risk assessment - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 8. A hospital emergency management plan that is aligned with the city’s emergency management plan - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 9. Comprehensive risk assessments of patient at admission (4) 22.2% - (4) 16.7%
 10. Fall risk assessment (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 11. Waterlow skin assessment (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
 12. Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
 13. Nursing pools (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 14. Risk prediction scores in anaesthesia (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 15. Preoperative assessment of patients (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
5. Integration and learning  1. Analysis of incidents and feedback leading to the implementation of safety lessons (8) 44.4% (4) 66.6% (12) 50%
 2. Learning from audits (1) 5.5% - (1) 4.2%
 3. Learning from patient safety alerts - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 4. Learning from patients’ complaints (2) 11% (1) 16.6% (3) 12.5%
 5. Learning from meetings and discussion of sentinel events (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%
 6. Debriefing sessions to provide feedback on clinical performance (3) 16.7% - (3) 12.5%
 7. Learning from root cause analysis (2) 11% (1) 16.6% (3) 12.5%
 8. Learning from excellence - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 9. Learning reported in research papers from other health organisations - (2) 33.3% (2) 8.3%
 10. learning from safety networks that involve local and national health agencies (1) 5.5% (2) 33.3% (3) 12.5%
 11. After action reviews (AAR) - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 12. Learning from international experience reported in the literature - (1) 16.6% (1) 4.2%
 13. Simulation sessions following patient safety incidents (5) 27.8% - (5) 20.8%
 14. Learning from mortality and morbidity reviews (2) 11% - (2) 8.3%