Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 19;38(2):113–122. doi: 10.15605/jafes.038.02.20

Table 5.

Risk of bias assessment of the included studies

Sl. No Authors and year Domain 1 (randomization process) Domain 2 (assignment to intervention) Domain 2 (adhering to intervention) Domain 3 (missing outcome data) Domain 4 (measurement of the outcome) Domain 5 (selection of the reported result) Overall risk of bias
1 Gowri et al., 2022 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
2 Kaur et al., 2021 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
3 Danasegaran et al., 2021 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
4 Viswanathan et al., 2021 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
5 Sharma et al., 2020 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
6 Kumpatla et al., 2015 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
7 Leischik 2021 Low risk Low risk Some concerns Low risk Low risk Low risk Some concerns
8 Rafii et al., 2018 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
9 Akbarina et al., 2018 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
10 Karstoft et al., 2013 Low risk Some concerns Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Some concerns
11 Yuniartikaet et al., 2021 Low risk Low risk Low risk Some concerns Low risk Low risk Some concerns
12 Gupta et al., 2020 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
13 Saberipour et al., 2020 Low risk Some concerns Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Some concerns
14 Singh et al., 2020 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
15 Keerthi et al., 2017 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
16 McDermott et al., 2014 Low risk High risk Low risk Some concerns High risk High risk High risk