Table 1.

Comparison of PLC-ζ localization patterns between grade‘d’ and other HOST grades

HOST grade	A	PA	EQ	A+PA	A+EQ	PA+EQ	A+PA+EQ
‘a’	0.46 ± 0.3	0.6 ± 0.23	0.96 ± 0.83	3.3 ± 0.5	1.2 ± 0.8	3.7 ± 0.9	7.4 ± 0.7
	P=0.16	P=0.01	P=0.25	P<0.001	P=0.13	P<0.001	P<0.001
‘b’	0.46 ± 0.3	0.36 ± 0.23	2.17 ± 0.83	2.7 ± 0.5	1.3 ± 0.79	3 ±.9	6.8 ± 0.7
	P=0.16	P=0.87	P=0.01	P<0.001	P=0.08	P=0. 001	P<0.001
‘c’	0.36 ± 0.3	0.32 ± 0.23	0.64 ± 0.83	1.5 ± 0.5	0.75 ± 0.79	1.5 ± 0.9	3 ± 0.7
	P=0.9	P=0.17	P=0.4	P=0.006	P=0.34	P=0.087	P<0.001
‘e’	0.46 ± 0.3	0.39 ± 0.23	0.17 ± 0.83	2.6 ± 0.5	0.96 ± 0.79	3 ± 0.9	4.6 ± 0.7
	P=0.16	P=0.09	P=0.83	P<0.001	P=0.22	P=0.001	P<0.001
‘f’	0.5 ± 0.3	0.46 ± 0.23	0.2 ± 0.83	3 ± 0.5	1.8 ±.79	3.9 ± 0.9	6.1 ± 0.7
	P=0.13	P=0.049	P=0.79	P<0.001	P=0.023	P<0.001	P<0.001
‘g’	0.18 ± 0.3	0.36 ± 0.23	0.9 ± 0.83	3.5 ± 0.5	2 ± 0.79	4.3 ± 0.9	8 ± 0.7
	P=0.6.3	P=0.13	P=0.3	P<0.001	P=0.012	P<0.001	P<0.001

The obtained P value of comparison of PLC-ζ localization patterns between grade 'd' and other HOST grades 'a', 'b', 'c', 'e', 'f', and 'g'. All data are presented as mean ± SE. Statistically significant (P≤0.05) differences are detailed in bold. PLC-ζ localization patterns: A; Acrosomal, E; Equatorial, PA; Post-acrosomal, A+EQ; Acrosomal and equatorial, A+PA; Acrosomal and post-acrosomal, EQ+PA; Equatorial and post-acrosomal, and A+EQ+PA; Acrosomal, equatorial, and post-acrosomal.