Table 1.
Summary of design requirements obtained from iterative co-design sessions.
| Design requirement theme | Requirements elicited during the first co-design session | Requirements elicited during the second co-design session | ||
|
|
ID | Specific design requirement | ID | Specific design requirement |
| (A) Present risk severity descriptively and visually | ||||
|
|
R1.1 | Communicate risk severity descriptively (eg, “low” or “high”) | N/Aa | N/A |
|
|
R1.3 | Visualize continuum of risk level |
|
|
| (B) Ensure appearance and navigation are user-friendly | ||||
|
|
R1.2 | Use real-world symbols to increase user-friendliness | R2.7 | Add page numbers to encourage users to review both pages |
|
|
R1.4 | Use color to highlight essential information |
|
|
|
|
R1.5 | Order sections to match users’ intuitive information processing expectations |
|
|
| (C) Frame risk identification and mitigation strategies in positive terms | ||||
|
|
R1.6 | Reduce patient and family anxiety by emphasizing positive impact risk mitigation strategies can provide | R2.3 | Maintain positive framing of optimizing comfort; include pain terminology in relevant sections |
|
|
|
|
R2.4 | Separate risk scale into before and after to highlight the effect of mitigation strategies |
|
|
|
|
R2.5 | Emphasize mitigation strategies and subsequent effects on reducing the risk of pain |
| (D) Clearly categorize and describe risks | ||||
|
|
R1.7 | Increase clarity by improving categorization of risk factors | R2.1 | Reword textual risk statements to increase readability and reduce anxiety |
| (E) Emphasize collaboration and effective communication | ||||
|
|
N/A | N/A | R2.2 | Emphasize collaboration of cross-functional care teams |
|
|
|
|
R2.6 | Create a separate page for the checklist and notes section |
aN/A: not applicable.