Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;21:477. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03192-z

Table 2.

Characteristics of the 60 study participants

Variable Burnout group (n = 30) Control group (n = 30) P-value
Age, years 46.77 (10.56) 52.93 (7.48) 0.012
Body mass index, kg/m2 25.63 (3.09) 24.35 (2.72) 0.094
Cardiovascular disease risk score, % 3.11 (1.89) 3.47 (1.89) 0.464
Alcohol, standard drinks/week 3.72 (3.22) 2.93 (2.30) 0.280
Physical activity, times/week 1.99 (1.62) 2.67 (1.92) 0.147
Emotional exhaustion, score 29.17 (7.13) 6.67 (3.99) 2 × 10−19
Depersonalization, score 11.33 (7.00) 3.07 (3.60) 8 × 10−7
Personal accomplishments, score 12.03 (6.74) 5.67 (4.37) 7 × 10−5
Effort-reward ratio 1.34 (0.41) 0.87 (0.27) 2 × 10−6
Effort, score 10.65 (1.36) 8.07 (2.13) 6 × 10−7
Reward, score 19.58 (4.03) 22.24 (2.96) 0.005
Overcommitment, score 16.65 (2.83) 12.43 (3.37) 2 × 10−6
Depressive symptoms, score 7.40 (3.13) 2.20 (1.97) 5 × 10−10
MBF, rest, mL/g/min 0.64 (0.13) 0.66 (0.10) 0.530
Coronary flow reserve (CPT) 1.50 (0.52) 1.48 (0.5) 0.838
MBF response (CPT), mL/g/min 0.32 (0.37) 0.33 (0.31) 0.966
Hyperemic MBF (CPT), mL/g/min 0.94 (0.44) 1.00 (0.32) 0.581
Coronary flow reserve (adenosine) 4.31 (1.43) 4.58 (1.09) 0.409
MBF response (adenosine), mL/g/min 2.05 (0.62) 2.27 (0.63) 0.176
Hyperemic MBF (adenosine), mL/g/min 2.66 (0.61) 2.96 (0.65) 0.075

Values given are mean and standard deviation (in parentheses). Normalized values are given for measures of coronary microvascular function. Group differences were calculated with independent samples t-test

CPT cold pressor test, MBF myocardial blood flow