Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;20:162. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01284-8

Table 4.

Results from the Custom Usability Questionnaire

Item no. Item Score P11*–15* Mean (SD) P11* P12* P13* P14* P15*
Q11 With the RHO, performing the tasks is easier. 3.4 (1.4) 5 3 1 4 4
Q12 The RHO helps me to perform tasks quicker. 3.4 (1.4) 5 4 1 3 4
Q13 The RHO gives me more control of my hand activity. 3.6 (1.4) 5 4 1 4 4
Q14 The RHO is easy to don and doff. 2.4 (0.8) 3 3 1 2 3
Q15 The RHO generates sufficient force while closing. 3.0 (0.6) 3 2 3 4 3
Q16 The RHO generates sufficient force while opening. 3.6 (0.5) 3 4 3 4 4
Q17 The RHO opens and closes quick enough. 4.2 (0.7) 5 3 4 5 4
Q18 The RHO is lightweight enough. 4.4 (0.5) 5 4 4 5 4
Q19 The RHO is well and firmly attached to the hand. 3.4 (1.0) 3 2 3 5 4
Q20 The movement generated by the RHO is pleasant. 4.0 (0.6) 4 4 3 5 2
Total score CUQtotal 63.5 (16.0) 77.5 57.5 35.0 77.5 70

Individual ratings and mean and standard deviation for each item rating and the overall scores are reported of the participants of group B

Individual ratings range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), and total score ranges from 0 to 100, wherein a higher value corresponds to a better rating of the RHO. (*: group B; SD: standard deviation)