Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 17;11:1294948. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1294948

Table 3.

Cross-sectional associations of biological age measures with cognitive function.

Cognitive function (z scores) KDM-BAacc PD
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
β (95%CI) p value β (95%CI) p value β (95%CI) p value β (95%CI) p value
Global −0.008 (−0.014, −0.002) 0.008 −0.007 (−0.012, −0.001) 0.018 −0.045 (−0.062, −0.028) <0.001 −0.034 (−0.050, −0.018) <0.001
Memory −0.010 (−0.018, −0.002) 0.013 −0.008 (−0.017, −0.000) 0.043 −0.034 (−0.058, −0.010) 0.005 −0.021 (−0.045,0.001) 0.065
Orientation −0.002 (−0.011,0.005) 0.480 −0.007 (−0.015,0.001) 0.112 −0.050 (−0.074, −0.026) <0.001 −0.042 (−0.065, −0.018) <0.001
Executive −0.007 (−0.015,0.000) 0.067 −0.007 (−0.015,0.001) 0.102 −0.052 (−0.075, −0.028) <0.001 −0.041 (−0.063, −0.018) <0.001

KDM-BAacc, Klemera and Doubal method, biological age acceleration; PD, physiological dysregulation; CI, confidence interval. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for education level, residence, BMI, marital status, current smoking and drinking status, night sleep and napping duration, depressive symptoms, and self-reported chronic diseases.