Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 10;41(12):3643–3650. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04690-8

Table 1.

Patients demographics and outcome in the three studied groups

Patients’ demographics Group I (n = 40) Group II (n = 40) Group III (n = 40) p Value
Patient age (month) 10–49 15–45 11–52 0.319
31 ± 18 28 ± 17 34 ± 18 Ӏ and II IӀ and III Ӏ and III
0.449 0.132 0.449
Meatal location
 Coronal 12 (30%) 12 (30%) 11 (27.5%) 0.971 Ӏ and II (0.965)
 Sub coronal 13 (32.5%) 14 (35%) 16 (40%) II and III (0.899)
 Distal penile 15 (37.5%) 14 (35%) 13 (32.5%) Ӏ and III (0.780)
Urethral plate width 0.412
Range 4–7 5–8 5–7 Ӏ and II II and III Ӏ and III
Mean ± SD 5.6 ± 1.2 6 ± 1.1 5.8 ± 0.8 0.378 0.753 0.811
Chordee 9 11 10 0.875
Ӏ and II II and III Ӏ and III
0.606 0.263 0.799
Out come Group Ӏ
(n = 40)
Group II
(n = 40)
Group III
(n = 40)
p-Value
Ӏ and II II and III Ӏ and III

Operative time (min.)

Range

Mean ± SD

81–112

98 ± 14

76–111

86 ± 25

60–93

71 ± 22

 < 0.01
0.011* 0.0001* 0.0001*
Success 35 (87.5%) 33 (82.5%) 25 (62.5%) 0.018*
0.531 0.045* 0.010*
Fistula 2 (5%) 2 (5%) 5 (7.5–12.5%) 0.339
1 0.432 0.432
Narrow meatus 2 (5%) 3 (7.5%) 7 (17.5%) 0.143
0.644 0.311 0.154
Glans dehiscence 1 (2.5%) 2 (5%) 8 (20%) 0.014*
0.556 0.043* 0.029*
Diverticulum 0 0 0